Jump to content

Warts 'n' all

Members
  • Posts

    4,131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by Warts 'n' all

  1. "worst advice ever".... You may well be right.

     

    I wouldn't want to spoil other player's fun by naming the scenario. But it has worked for me once. I only made one slight change to the initial disposition of my troops during the set-up phase and that was it. A "Total Victory" with only a few casualties. When checking on my troops at the end, I noticed that one of my AT Guns had turned almost 180 degrees and knocked out two enemy vehicles without any orders. 

  2. I tried the dropbox link too, and it worked a treat, unlike my past attempts via GAJ and the repository that only gave me the divisional logo on the vehicles. I'm so impressed with the uniforms that I can't resist the temptation to take another wander down The Scottish Corridor and put CMFI on hold for a while. Somehow I suspect that I will get my Limey arse kicked just as hard as I did when I tried this campaign a year ago. But at least, my dead Jocks will look great. 

  3. A brilliant series, I've really enjoyed it following through to the end.

     

    @ Heinrich .... My old girlfriend used to own a restaurant that played host to veterans from the battle every September, none of them would ever have said "FRAAK". Perhaps you're not allowed to use the word that they actually used, which strikes me as a bit sad.

  4. It would have been nice if the US Military could have used different letters for different things... R for rifle, M for Mortar etc.  But they put names behind everything so it wasn't a problem for them at the time, e.g... M3 half-track, M3 light tank etc. Little did they realise then that 70/80 years later they would be confusing the likes of us.

  5. I have to agree with the OP... It must make a big enough difference otherwise BFC wouldn't have bothered to have "spalling" and "partial penetration" indicated.

     

    My own personal take on it, in terms of game play. When I see "spalling" I think, "Good, the enemy crew are getting little flakes of hot metal in their faces". When I see "partial penetration" I think "Even better, we've dented the b*******, one more shot like that and we've got 'em". This may not be the most technical of answers. But, I wouldn't want "spalling" and "partial penetration" to be replaced by the single word "hit".

  6. I think that the article has to be taken with a massive pinch of salt. It strikes me as a string of cliches rather than a serious attempt at historical analysis.

     

    If we are talking about the decisions made in August 44. We have to keep in mind the fact that the logistic planners wanted to open up the ports in Brittany. Therefore, the idea of 3rd Army cutting around behind the Germans and trapping them against the Seine or the Somme was never an option. 

     

    Another concern voiced at the time (however rightly or wrongly), was that having 3rd Army advance North to trap the Germans, would have lead to 3rd Army becoming over stretched and therefore quite easily punched through by the retreating Panzers. 

     

    Trying to depict it as a choice between a ponderous "Monty" and a gung-ho "Patton" is an insult to our intelligence. And an even bigger insult to Generals Bradley, Dempsey, Horrrocks, Collins etc 

×
×
  • Create New...