weapon2010

So now how do i know other things arn't or won't be missing from other campaigns or scenarios?

how did you extract the scenario from the campaign?

save game is no problem, who wants it?

so I restarted this campaign about 5 times and the at gun never shows up, the at gun crew is in the ht, but no ht I can provide screenshots if needed

Ok my bad,Steve didnt exactly say"I dont know how were going to leave them out",lol I was kind of paraphrasing.Shouldnt have quoted him.I was going on memory. "Motorcycles present a unique challenge because they have unique physics characteristics that the game doesn't currently have. Fortunately for the timeframes we've simulated so far, motorcycles were pretty much relegated to messengers and other HQ duties. That's not true for 1939-1942 timeframe where they were standard recon element for German units before Volkswagens took over. When we get to that timeframe we're probably going to have to bite the bullet and support them." This is the quote I remeber, which I was shocked to hear coming from Steve, because Im interpreting this as motorcycles will be in at some point, and if that is true, imagine what other sweet things are coming our way!

Cant comment on horses or bicycles, but Steve absolutley said"I dont know how were going to leave them out",refering to motorcycles on the Eastern Front!

Ian,I did unload the crew and issued them move orders, they dont move , they stay"stuck"behind the HT.Still no at gun.I will reload the campaign as Martyr did and see if it appears.

right, but its notthere now after 3.0 install, womble,or someone, can you check to see if its there?

The 75mm pak 40 at gun is no where to be found,the crew is in the HT but no gun, I clearly remember the at gun being on the map a while ago when I played this.Pre 3.0 Can someone confirm?

They should all stop if the hunt command was issued.

Montanaza why would anyone ever need hard copies if there are unlimited downloads?

so Montanaza why didnt you purchase the hard copy by mail as well?what is your thinking on that issue?

Let me add that I do totaly understand BF's economic reasoning for not adding "Tank Riders" to CMBN family.I just want them in dam it because it is cool! ok, Im done on this issue, got my 2 cents in.

did you just purchase the digital dl?and we now have no limit on the amount of dl's?correct?

Im considering buying the digital dl for 95$.Does this mean the full game consisting of CMBN,CW,1.11,2.0,MG,2.12 comes in one smooth dl? and all I have to do is apply the 3.0 upgrade?

Let the player determine through trial and error how risky"tank riding" is. Let the player decide when and how he would like to use"tank riding". Let the player develope his own tactics. Let the player figure it out. Running "fast" as a full squad in the open is considered really stupid and dangerous by almost every competent squadleader, but were allowed to do it. The ironic part is the 3.0 upgrade is promoting larger maps, so now we have larger Normandy maps, which we need more of a mobility option.It would be nice to have the "option" to tank ride through the safe zone that has been properly scouted for Gerry to the forward "danger area" and dismount.

JonS, "Bovine meat sponge" "you have no skin" Your scaring me,please stop.

Jon s Its not complicated, Did Americans and Germans ride on Tanks in Normandy?Yes And is aa guns shooting at planes a critical part of a cm battle?no, but its in,and Im glad it is.

if that's the case then im fine with that, just let us know, im not fine with no tank riders or "any feature" that is in one version and not in another

BF, Im normaly on board with everything you guys do.But I must disagree with leaving major game improvements out . Just because something is rare in a particular theater of war, does not mean it should not be included,BF should not pick and choose major gameplay features to leave out because they think it was rare, if it was too much work to add tank riders, then charge more for the upgrade, don't leave "cool features" out, that's going backwards, keep adding "cool stuff" and keep all the games equal in features, this is only going to confuse and frustrate players, we now currently have 2 different versions of the 3.0 upgrade.I don't get it.

I don't get that?Its a major game improvement, why not include it?

thanks moon

that doesn't make any sense, 2.0 must be first, to support mg, the question is when do you install 2.12 before or after mg or not at all

im doing a reinstall, do I patch 2.0 to 2.12 before installing market garden?or don't install at all?

I meant more an update where we stand with packs for CMBN or FI, or an update of whats coming?