roqf77

thats because we gave your our culture. so since then you have only lagged 270 years behind us!(just kidding!).

actualy soddbal put his up first but hey.

just one more pestery question to battlefront! i see an implication from your spiking comment,that abandoned guns and such can be re manned so to speak?

mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!

fair play. looks like this will never be laid to rest.

was faster though. at 35 mph too. all good interesting stuff any more?

but i still doubt poland had the strength to hold of a concerted effort from germany for too long.

http://www.lanl.gov/history/wartime/britishmission.shtml the britsh involvement.

[ August 19, 2005, 12:02 PM: Message edited by: roqf77 ]

[ August 19, 2005, 11:49 AM: Message edited by: roqf77 ]

well actualy just to point out a couple of things. the nuclear bombs dropped on japan, were finished in the germany(the designs). The us only built it. so the germany(some from the uk including james tuck) and alot of other euro's so to speak have nukes. the uk certainly does. it was actualy frank whittle who invented the jet engine so it was a uk not a us thing. and chobbam too(uk produced not frank whittle). my name is the roqf. as in royal ordinance quick firing. 77 refering to the 77mm on the comet. its just a name of a gun. just sounds cool. i personaly would pick rommel over patton, but to open the topic up a little, not bradley. (and yes wicky i see your point, but 1, it was a typo and 2. the uk did have an involvement in the project). [ August 19, 2005, 11:57 AM: Message edited by: roqf77 ]

maybe true. like i said im not 100% sure. and i have not read this book. but the germans and britisah after action reports match up almost exactly. The british knocked out 3 tigers and the canadian 2. the wintess to wittmans death was in the group of tiger tanks. again there were people who claimed to see wittman bombed by a typhoon, so reports cannot be relied on.

it wouldnt surpise me if p-51 d was lewis.

fair enough. ive kinda got the whole thing now. i was simply offended at the politcal swing of the posts. simply because i normaly post in the cm threads. i have began to reply back somewhat politicaly inorder to reply hte other people. like i said im not anti american. my mother is. i think the us made a good contribution to the war effort. i just think its just not as all encompasing as some think. nor do i think the us runs the world. that is all. so hello and howz it goin? anybody know who replaced turpin?

well the concernd few i guess.

basicly thats it. what were the pro's n cons of the t-23 over the sherman. any info is welcome, but mainly id like to know would of it been a good or a bad thing.

ive got a better idea for dealing with lewis! why dont we use his ip to find where he lives and physicaly remove him from the internet!

i thought i took that from you rleete?

there actualy quiet funny. do you write for comics or something?

please dont take it personaly. im calling into question your character. or you as a human being. dont take it that seriously. i just exagerate because im not the best in the world at cumminicating. i was simply saying im not the only one in the thread/board, that has not been the perfect gentleman the whole time.

lol.

well jon you just proved my point, thankyou. hellraiser im dyslexic, so thats whats up with my spelling. is camembert a type of cheese?

well seeing as nobody care about or enough to enforce the rules, why hark on about them. just admit it you dont agree with what im saying. ENTERING JON J RAMBO MODE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Omg america is teh leet skills ownerz the rest is teh lame, we am da best omg omg omg. you is teh noobs wa wa wa wa EXITING JON J RAMBO MODE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sorry for my outburst but in this thread you have claimed for one that all germans are tuetonic knoights who are smuggling wmd's to the middle east. Which is a massivly racist and discriminitory statement to make. but hey i thought politics on a non politics forum is bad. so obviously im wrong right seamonkey? So in summary, racism good! politics bad! i admit freely i have been rude here but no worse than anyone else. so seamonkey what is your real problem. i think i deserve to know.

very interesting. however bovington have this info as well. and still believe it to be 1 ny. as they dont recall any sp's i believe, only tiger tanks. also they claim to have engaged the tigers from about 800 yards and slightly over, this fits there position in. lastly the 17 pounder as jon states does lose accuaracy at that range but only with discarding sabot ammo, with apcbc which the tiger was killed with was perfectly accurate infact more accurate than most. it seems like alot of german tanks got caught up in a well placed ambush, so there will be alot of confusion. i mean there were five tigers knocked out the british claim 3 the canadians claim 2. and the germans claim they were engaged by the british(wittmans group) and were in a group of 3 tiger tanks. but obviously you cannot be 100% sure.

well. the case for the canadians ay be solid. but it has been explained to me that it is a near certainty that it was the british. i mean the tank was recovered in los of the british positions. not the canadians. the patrols path would of taken it past them too. did they knock out tanks to? maybe they knockod out of tiger tanks? and thought it was wittman. but of course you cant be 100% sure about alot of things.