Phillies Phan

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Grey_Wolf: Hello Kids, I wonder how well the Phillies will be doing this year! Will our pitching improve or will we have to keep going to the Bullpen in the 2nd inning? These are important things to consider when you need a team to get to the playoffs and beat the hated Yankees in the World Series. If you have any questions, just contact me at ICQ (XXXXXXXXXX). Go Phillies! Big, Grey_Wolf [ 06-24-2001: Message edited by: Grey_Wolf ]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I think they will go all the way.

You are each proving that you read PL's verbiose post after all. You just can't help it. Its like a traffic accident. YK2 I've never been in a click in my life. I've been in a queue at the local liqueor store. I think PL enjoys all the attention. If he didn't, then he wouldn't post so often. Mr. Shaw Wander over to your nearest Post Office and approve the postage rate hike. They care about you as much as we do. Your approval of everything is somewhat disheartening. You should be dubbed "the jellyfish knight". Ambiguity unleashed OGSF Oh, won't you please call me Jimmy?? I'm thinking about printing out your posts and putting them up in my new office. The first of my employees who can sucessfully translate it gets a free lunch in the cafeteria. I'm not posting about my games because I am bored of them. I might need a new computer game soon. [ 06-24-2001: Message edited by: Phillies Phan ]

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by russellmz: ...pulsating...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> ...yellow...

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Berlichtingen: Fellow Knights and perticularly Seanachai! I put forward that the Squire MrSpkr should be elevated to knighthood for his bold coup on the Outer Board. For those who have not heard, MrSpkr weaseled himself into the Invitational, thus spreading the influence of the Mutha Beautiful Thread<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> I agree. Mister Sprinkler should be a knight and Pamper Leaker should be kicked, punched, and bludgeoned repeatedly. We all know that Mister Sprinkler isn't fun to look at and that he smells funny. Funny like goat ****. We also know that he is famous for unzipping and dancing the macarana whenever the theme to the A-Team is played. *********** Sir Lorak Please scribe thusly: On this the 2049th Day of Peng, we descend the following personage to knighthood of the Cesspool. His duties will include scraping the mildew off of the various and sundry port-a-potties of the outerboard. He will be responsible for supervising the lashings and bludgeoning of newbies (SSN's) and is expected to take much pleasure from the same. Of course, this is my Oh-so-humble recommendation to you, as as the most insignificant Knight of the Greatest and most Mighty Cesspool known to humankind. Long live Peng and his faithful minions. Go Phillies!! [ 06-23-2001: Message edited by: Phillies Phan ]

Foo, you mean you want to hear that Sgt Shultz guy say things like "I know nutink, nuuuutink."

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by russellmz: ...pair of...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> ...Australian Mac Daddies. They pimped the Sheilas and tooted their digeredoos. One of them was fond of saying "I'll give all me oscah for some Kitty Lovin". He was a bit touched in the head and liked to...

General Pershing, it figures.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Phillies Phan: ...yours truly. Mace's favorite Air Supply song went something like this: Here I am The sheep that you shove asking for a bale of hay Mace's favorite AC/DC song went something like this: My sheep are always bouncing to the left and to the right Its my belief that my white sheep should be shagged ev'ry night Mace's favorite Olivia Newton John song went like this... [ 06-22-2001: Message edited by: Phillies Phan ]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> .... Let's get sheepical, sheepical. Come on and get sheepical Lets get into into sheepical Let me hear your wool talk The Australian Mac Daddy was also fond of playing with his unusually small... (PS You are all bastards for not contributing to the FAQ for an entire friggen day. I hate you all and hope you get rashes) [ 06-22-2001: Message edited by: Phillies Phan ]

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Mace: ...an atrocious band with no talent that was well rid of when we crated them up and posted them over to USA. And talking about 'no talent', guess who followed up this very post? No other than...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> ...yours truly. Mace's favorite Air Supply song went something like this: Here I am The sheep that you shove asking for a bale of hay Mace's favorite AC/DC song went something like this: My sheep are always bouncing to the left and to the right Its my belief that my white sheep should be shagged ev'ry night Mace's favorite Olivia Newton John song went like this... [ 06-22-2001: Message edited by: Phillies Phan ]

Originally posted by JDMorse. They were so profound, I beleive they deserve a repeat. Daily Affirmations for the Unstable > I no longer need to punish, deceive or compromise myself. Unless, of > course, I want to stay employed. > A good scapegoat is nearly as welcome as a solution to the problem. > As I let go of my feelings of guilt, I can get in touch with my Inner > Sociopath. > I have the power to channel my imagination into ever-soaring levels of > suspicion and paranoia. > Today, I will gladly share my experience and advice, for there are no > sweeter words than "I told you so." > I need not suffer in silence while I can still moan, whimper and complain. > > As I learn the innermost secrets of the people around me, they reward me > in many ways to keep me quiet. > I assume full responsibility for my actions, except the ones that are > someone else's fault. > I honor my personality flaws, for without them I would have no personality > at all. > Joan of Arc heard voices too. > When someone hurts me, forgiveness is cheaper than a lawsuit, but not > nearly as gratifying. > The first step is to say nice things about myself. The second, to do nice > things for myself. The third, to find someone to buy me nice things. > As I learn to trust the universe, I no longer need to carry a gun. > Just for today, I will not sit in my living room all day watching TV. > Instead I will move my TV into the bedroom. > Who can I blame for my own problems? Give me just a minute... I'll find > someone. > Why should I waste my time reliving the past when I can spend it worrying > about the future? > I will find humor in my everyday life by looking for people I can laugh > at. > I am willing to make the mistakes if someone else is willing to learn from > them.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Mace: ...who was currently unavailable to counter the verbal abuse and insults about to directed at him by the FAQers. In fact, it was much deserved as Gustav1.09 was a....<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> ...distant cousin of Mister Sprinkler. (the incontinent fisherman) Mister Sprinkler fancied himself to be a favorite at parties. He would unzip...

Panzer Leader, stop accepting challenges. You don't owe them or us anything. Geier will dislike you anyway. I pleaded with the old firm ad naseum when I first splashed into the pool and I think it was four months later when they posted that they are trying to ignore me. So, quit being an idiot and accepting challenges. A little tip for ya. Whenever somebody calls you "mouse", you reply with "I know you are, but what am I"? It worked for Pee Wee Herman.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Maximus: ...guys from Rush with their greatest hits compilation of Chronicles. Gotta have a little Tom Sawyer in his Subdivisions. You also can't forget Bastille Day. However, the FAQ'ers were wondering why russelmz restarted the mutha'beautiful FAQ thread. russelmz replied, "...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> "...because I love mods. I don't love them but I do need them. No, wait. We all need some mods, yeah yeah. Slap me some skin, mod-daddy." Then Russell (the love muscle) sauntered off into his psychedelic van and drove away, never to be mentioned again. We continue our story of passion and ice cream with our stars Fluffy and...

I refuse to bump a thread created by the impudent lackwit known as Panzer Leader. Nope. Won't do it.

Tell me more, tell me more like does Mensch have a car. (go grease lightning)

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Lorak: [QB Lorak "god how i wish just once I would get some news that is mildly suprising! A win by Phan! A short post by Seanachai. Hell even a note stating that Berli was seen wearing ear muffs." [ 06-18-2001: Message edited by: Lorak ][/QB]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> It's just a fleshwound. Sir Lorak, it was a draw and it was vs Elvis. Thankee Sai

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Panzer Leader: I am the Panzer Leader!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> What you are is a punk. If you think otherwise, then you're wrong. If you whine like a punk and strut like a punk, then you're a punk. Your kind can be found on playgrounds accross the United States bragging about your skateboard your mommy bought you. Now, do us a favor and shut up. Punk

on my way, sir. right away sir.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Mace: ...one life-form said to the other life-form...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> ..."Roight, its time for some AC/DC to put us Aussies in the mood. Who has the Fostah's? We don't need Sheila's or...

I'm having a problem with my cat. He insists on playing in the litter box.

www.refdesk.com www.libraryspot.com Enjoy them.

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Adam Lloyd: Unfotunately I get a TON of CRC errors (as described by an earlier poster) in 3 of the zips. Is there any way they could be recompiled? I find it odd that others aren't getting the error. Maybe it depends what you unzip them with? Strange.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> It would appear that you've gotten your zipper stuck.

I found a complaint generator and put in Pamper Leaker's name. Enjoy!! To respond to all of Mr. Pamper Leaker's half-measures would take up too much room and time. I would like to address the most whiney ones, though. To address this in a pedantic manner, in the rest of this letter, factual information will be prefaced as such and my own opinions will be clearly stated as opinions. For instance, it is a fact that I don't care what others say about Mr. Leaker. He's still heinous, lackadaisical, and he intends to demonstrate an outright hostility to law enforcement. The real question here is not, "Whatever happened to community standards?". The real question is rather, "What does he hope to achieve by repeatedly applying his lips to the posteriors of clueless party animals?" I've never really gotten a clear and honest answer to that question from Mr. Leaker. But what is clear is that he maliciously defames and damagingly misrepresents everyone and everything around him. There's a word for that: libel. For better or for worse, when I first became aware of his covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how the first response to this from his emissaries is perhaps that the ideas of "freedom" and "authoritarianism" are Siamese twins. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: We mustn't let him push all of us to the brink of insanity. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. But I digress. Someone once said to me, "This conviction of mine is as firm as a rock." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since. Listen up: Mr. Leaker parrots whatever ideas are fashionable at the moment. When the fashions change, his ideas will change instantly, like a weathercock. If you don't think that I am flat-out tired of his psychological bullying, then think again. Mr. Leaker wants to contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. More fundamentally, we should reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from his objectives. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) I may not believe that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully, but I doubtlessly do contend that his stooges have been arrested in numerous murders, violent assaults, and bank robberies across the nation. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. The truth hurts, doesn't it, Mr. Leaker? Stick your nose into anything he has written recently, and you'll get a good whiff of vainglorious McCarthyism. All this aside, the first lies that he told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; Mr. Leaker's lies will grow until they blot out the sun. No matter how much talk and analysis occurs, some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that by using bombastic language and selective quotation, Mr. Leaker is able to make people suspicious of those who speak the truth. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation. Any meaningful analysis of the situation must allow for the fact that if it weren't for baleful perjurers, he would have no friends. Like a verbal magician, Mr. Leaker knows how to lie without appearing to be lying, how to bury secrets in mountains of garbage-speak. Quite simply, this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about his egocentric behavior, but about the way that we can't let unsophisticated, vapid shysters ram his equivocations down our throats. End of story. Actually, I should add that he has spent untold hours trying to feed us ever-larger doses of his lies and crackpot assumptions. During that time, did it ever once occur to him that this is a problem long overdue for debate? Well, I'm sure Mr. Leaker would rather get on my nerves than answer that particular question. I feel no shame in writing that if Mr. Leaker can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If Mr. Leaker can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it. Maybe he has a reason for acting the way he does, but I doubt it. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Mr. Leaker had learned anything from history, he'd know that I know that what he seems to be forgetting is that disrespectful loudmouths must be treated with political justice, not with civil justice, as they are surely not real citizens. You know that. But does he know we know that? The most appealing theory has to do with the way that he seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, the most tyrannical rotters you'll ever see. It is deeply unfortunate that the final product of Mr. Leaker's sentiments will be a dysfunctional society, wherein every natural self-defense mechanism has been short-circuited in some sick effort to gain short-term financial benefits, since Mr. Leaker recently stated that we should all bear the brunt of his actions. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary, because if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to offer true constructive criticism -- listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem. Without checks and balances, the worst classes of reprehensible traitors there are are free to generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. To cap that off, the really interesting thing about all this is not that he tries to make his commentaries more palatable by wrapping them in rhetoric about the need to protect the interests of the disadvantaged and the downtrodden. The interesting thing is that it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about him and about hypothetical solutions to our Mr. Leaker problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that you should not ask, "Why can't he value a diversity of approaches without needing to rank them as better and worse?", but rather, "Why do we put up with him?". The latter question is the better one to ask, because ever since he decided to sue people at random, his consistent, unvarying line has been that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all totally justified. I don't like to repeat myself, but in order to convince us that he has a "special" perspective on expansionism which carries with it a "special" right to make nearby communities victims of environmental degradation and toxic waste dumping, Mr. Leaker often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. While some of his arguments are very attractive on the surface and are indisputably entertaining, they ultimately serve to produce nothing but filth. Because "theoanthropomorphism" is a word that can be interpreted in many ways, we must make it clear that he can get away with lies (e.g., that arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming), because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Mr. Leaker is lying. You may be wondering why what I call patronizing exhibitionists latch onto his self-fulfilling prophecies. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why I recently overheard a couple of oppressive, yellow-bellied scalawags say that Mr. Leaker is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. Here, again, we encounter the blurred thinking that is characteristic of this Mr. Leaker-induced era of slogans and propaganda. He doesn't want us to stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. He would rather we settle for the meatless bone of emotionalism. Mr. Leaker's conclusions are destructive. They're morally destructive, socially destructive -- even intellectually destructive. And, as if that weren't enough, Mr. Leaker wants nothing less than to lead people towards iniquity and sin, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his presumptuous subliminal psywar campaigns. His ebullitions have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life! If it is not yet clear that Mr. Leaker has more understanding of beer and milk regulations than of farsighted plans for the future, then consider that if I seem a bit irresponsible, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with him on his own level. There is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil people like Mr. Leaker. You should never forget the three most important facets of his recommendations, namely their unconscionable origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. What is happening between Mr. Leaker's cohorts and us is not a debate. It is not a friendly disagreement between enlightened people. It is a birdbrained attack on our most cherished institutions. If I have characterized Mr. Leaker's operatives up to now as disloyal and churlish, it is only because we are becoming a nation of disaffected, randy degenerates. And here, I feel, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in Mr. Leaker's belief systems. Without a doubt, however, if you ever ask Mr. Leaker to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. How did he get so treacherous? I have my theories, but they're only speculation. At any rate, it is not uncommon for him to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole bloody-minded affair as some great benefit to humanity. Comments on the above are welcome, but please think them out first. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Speedbump: A Public Service announcement: For those of us with a "normal" dial-up connection: Sucks to be you! Speedbump<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Please refrain from using that statement insofar as I have a patent out on that and the "hi mom" statements. I originally used the "Sucks to be you" on Croda when his sig was huge and cumbersome. ******************************************** Nuther Topic altogether: I'd rather have a thousand tanks burning and all my troops routed on my screen than have what happened to my family member. Thanks for the support for those of you who sent the kind words and thoughts. It would appear that the ones who have the strongest potential for insults have the deepest compassion too. Your turns will be coming shortly and the moves will be plotted poorly. No change there.

This has got to be the most informative thread I've stumbled upon in a year. I love that you gentlemen are explaining the reasons why things are the way they are. I've used trial and error thus far with defending. There was more error than trial though. Thanks for the effort and committment you all have put into this thread. Perhaps if I study your words diligently, I might win a PBEM.