illo

Il-2 has great graphics and stunning detail. And its much older than CMBB. CMBB is great game yes. Its graphics arent todays standard tho. I think this is mostly because relatively old game engine by now.

T-28 "Milk train", Grant "Coffin for seven brothers" and even mine dogs? all made up? :confused: [edited because im stupid [ January 02, 2003, 10:23 PM: Message edited by: illo ]

Hmmm...shouldnt Stug IV have 8 roadwheels/side. I think one in pic is Stug III.

Great! Could you possibly ask what range could they hit enemy vehicles? Were kills from range of 3000m normal?

IIRC I read somewhere just the opposite. Himmler being in charge of Volksturm had power to direct them large amounts of automatic weapons. With VS units low combat value this was ofcourse waste of resources. [ December 30, 2002, 05:52 PM: Message edited by: illo ]

So sweet panzer IVGs. I love that two tone one.

Impressive mr. Noob. Now that every soviet tank has been modded atleast twice maybe someone would start modding axis vehicles? You can count mods for late war axis verhicles with single hand. Shiny non weatherd axis tanks hurt in my eye in battlefield. Fix or do somefink!

So can I order my US version online now? This CDV version kills my cd drive sooner or later. (Feels like this Safedisk is based on putting intentional bad sectors on CD. Atleast it sounds like that)

How about shades of brown instead of green under the snow?

WOOHOO!

Andrew! Andrew! Have you abandoned these poor fellows?! Where is their winter gear?!

Andrew! Andrew! Have you abandoned these poor fellows?! Where is their winter gear?!

Nooo, it's resting.

nice [ December 14, 2002, 11:58 PM: Message edited by: illo ]

Interface could be better. As few examples... Mouse wheel to adjust camera elevation. Unautoresetting camera angles would be ok too. Pictures tell quite much of game. So I don't wonder why they were used. [ December 14, 2002, 06:56 PM: Message edited by: illo ]

Interface could be better. As few examples... Mouse wheel to adjust camera elevation. Unautoresetting camera angles would be ok too. Pictures tell quite much of game. So I don't wonder why they were used. [ December 14, 2002, 06:56 PM: Message edited by: illo ]

Download link is dead at http://www.cmbbhq.net/ and site has not been updated for 2 months.

Thanks.

I need convert some wav files to 44.100Khz. (So that they would work with CMBB) Couldn't find any free program to do it. Can you help?

Thanks, Doodle. [ December 14, 2002, 11:38 AM: Message edited by: illo ]

Thanks. So its same gun in question.

Thanks, that seems quite reasonable. My tanks must have been shooting slightly off angle then.

Its part of front armor not a side box. [edit]after looking some more pics it seems extension over tracks could be ammo storage. However parts visible over driver plate slopes are actually also front plate. So those slopes at sides wont have much effect considering shots coming directly from front.[/edit] Isn't this vertical armor plate? [ December 13, 2002, 11:31 PM: Message edited by: illo ]

Could you explain me how hitting hull part you call "side box" in Valentine. Differs from hitting of front plate in PZKpfw IV? As you can see from profile inside those boxes were crew compartment. No additional armor is underneath them. 75mm round inside crew compartment will have some meaningful effect. :/ [ December 13, 2002, 11:35 PM: Message edited by: illo ]

If I search on net result will be everywhere. 37mm Flak 43 L/89 In CMBB I see. 37mm L/57 Which one is correct? How do these two cannons differ in performance? http://users.swing.be/tanks/engins2/346.html http://www.achtungpanzer.com/flak4.htm