Michael Dorosh Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 I thought winners of the Darwin Award had to be dead in order to collect. Don't get my hopes up like that, Roger Dodger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Radley Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Joe Shaw: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Boo Radley: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Moriarty: And the winner is: Boo Makes sense ... I should have realized that you COULDN'T have picked it up from READING a book, let alone a Conan Doyle book. You MIGHT have watched a movie in which Moriarty was mentioned I suppose, but that would have been too high brow for you ... which is odd considering how low your forehead is. Joe </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Perhaps, after this battle we are now engaged in, I will create a little scenario for the two of us and call it Reichenbach Falls.That sounds like a solution ... 7% one presumes? Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Radley Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Joe Shaw: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Perhaps, after this battle we are now engaged in, I will create a little scenario for the two of us and call it Reichenbach Falls.That sounds like a solution ... 7% one presumes? Joe </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stikkypixie Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 I kissed the kids at noon then stumbled out the room I caught a cab ran up a tab on 7th and flower best recital I had to ruin missed my son's graduation punched the Nickles boy for taking his seat gets all that anger from me still things could be much worse natural disasters on the evening news still things could be much worse we still got our health my paycheck in the mail I promised to my wife and children I'd never touch another drink as long as I live but even then it sounds so soothing this will blow over in time this will all blow over in time I'm just an honest man provide for me and mine I give a check to tax deductable charity organizations two weks paid vacation won't heal the damage done I need another one still things could be much worse natural disasters on the evening news still things could be much worse we still got our health my paycheck in the mail I promised to my wife and children I'd never touch another drink as long as I live but even then it sounds so soothing to mix a drink and sink into oblivion I promised to my wife and children that accident left everyone a little shook up but at the meetings I felt so empty this will blow over in time this will all blow over in time COLD WAR KIDS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Boo Radley: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Perhaps, after this battle we are now engaged in, I will create a little scenario for the two of us and call it Reichenbach Falls.That sounds like a solution ... 7% one presumes? Joe </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Radley Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Joe Shaw: WHAT? You accuse ME of not knowing Holmes when YOU FIRST thought of a WW2 movie when Moriarty was mentioned?Did I say I FIRST thought of a WW2 movie? No. And that's because I didn't first think of a WW2 movie. I analyzed the name and the context it was in and THEN made my deduction. Please desist in creating fantasies out of whole cloth. As to your scurrilous allegation, did you think the title sprang forth from thin air? The Sign of Four </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />"It is cocaine," he said, "a seven-per-cent solution. Would you care to try it?"[sNEER] HAH! [/sNEER] Joe </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bauhaus Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Moriarty: And someone with a much lower member number than thee. Nuff, said. Gotta love playing "the member number" card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leeo Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Perhaps you putrescent biddies could put yer purses down and pull yer knickers back up. It's like watching geek fight thumb wrestling night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bauhaus Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Boo Radley: Or are you competing against Joe in the "Hey, I'm Way Denser Than Lead" competition? Does a creature exist that is "way denser (sic-should be more dense, but I understand the play on words. Sorry, I've been dealing with 7th grade LA waaaay too much) than Joe? I think not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Boo Radley: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw: WHAT? You accuse ME of not knowing Holmes when YOU FIRST thought of a WW2 movie when Moriarty was mentioned?Did I say I FIRST thought of a WW2 movie? No. And that's because I didn't first think of a WW2 movie. I analyzed the name and the context it was in and THEN made my deduction. Please desist in creating fantasies out of whole cloth. As to your scurrilous allegation, did you think the title sprang forth from thin air? The Sign of Four </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />"It is cocaine," he said, "a seven-per-cent solution. Would you care to try it?"[sNEER] HAH! [/sNEER] Joe </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nidan1 Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by bauhaus: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Moriarty: And someone with a much lower member number than thee. Nuff, said. Gotta love playing "the member number" card. </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bauhaus Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Nidan1: Yeah TWO twits that signed onto the forum in the early times, and then just thankfully stopped posting. Oh.....but if the pattern could only repeat itself. But we came back for the good of the community. We came back for the good of the game. But we really came back for the good of BFC. We wanted BFC to feel the love of the community, to feel wanted, to feel needed. We wanted BFC to well.....ummm....feel.....for lack of a better description. And for your information, I AM sitting down!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flammenwerfer Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Joe Shaw: He was here and slinging insults far better than YOU ever have... Is that WHY we are here? To sling insults. Insults refined to an artform. Dodgeball with a running commentary; a SCREAMing, shape-shifting calamity, barreling on to the horizon? That wasn't in the fecking BROCHURE, Mr. Shaw . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by flammenwerfer: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw: He was here and slinging insults far better than YOU ever have... Is that WHY we are here? To sling insults. Insults refined to an artform. Dodgeball with a running commentary; a SCREAMing, shape-shifting calamity, barreling on to the horizon? That wasn't in the fecking BROCHURE, Mr. Shaw . </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bauhaus Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by flammenwerfer: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw: He was here and slinging insults far better than YOU ever have... Is that WHY we are here? To sling insults. Insults refined to an artform. Dodgeball with a running commentary; a SCREAMing, shape-shifting calamity, barreling on to the horizon? That wasn't in the fecking BROCHURE, Mr. Shaw . </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Radley Posted February 21, 2007 Share Posted February 21, 2007 Originally posted by Joe Shaw: AHA! So I've proven yet again that YOU ARE A DILETTANTE ... Joe Oh. Really? I challenge you to a Sherlock Holmes trivia contest. In this contest, no Googling or Wikipedia is allowed. No checking of reference materials is allowed. No watching of old Basil Rathbone or Jeremy Brett movies or programs is allowed. (For questions OR answers!) There is no "safety line" calls allowed. Just what you have in your brain. As it were. I'll begin. Who was "That Woman"? p.s. We will accept "closies" when it comes to the spelling of proper names. [ February 21, 2007, 05:11 PM: Message edited by: Boo Radley ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Originally posted by Boo Radley: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw: AHA! So I've proven yet again that YOU ARE A DILETTANTE ... Joe Oh. Really? I challenge you to a Sherlock Holmes trivia contest. In this contest, no Googling or Wikipedia is allowed. No checking of reference materials is allowed. No watching of old Basil Rathbone or Jeremy Brett movies or programs is allowed. (For questions OR answers!) There is no "safety line" calls allowed. Just what you have in your brain. As it were. I'll begin. Who was "That Woman"? p.s. We will accept "closies" when it comes to the spelling of proper names. </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Radley Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Originally posted by Joe Shaw: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Boo Radley: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw: AHA! So I've proven yet again that YOU ARE A DILETTANTE ... Joe Oh. Really? I challenge you to a Sherlock Holmes trivia contest. In this contest, no Googling or Wikipedia is allowed. No checking of reference materials is allowed. No watching of old Basil Rathbone or Jeremy Brett movies or programs is allowed. (For questions OR answers!) There is no "safety line" calls allowed. Just what you have in your brain. As it were. I'll begin. Who was "That Woman"? p.s. We will accept "closies" when it comes to the spelling of proper names. </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 And what part of ... I'll not subject the lads to the tedium of seeing you cast about for the answer like Lestrade after an obvious clue.... did you not understand? But it's just like you to score ONLY your question and not mine. AND MINE WASN'T EVEN A QUESTION! As to YOUR question, her name was Griselda ... prove me wrong without using references. Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuka Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Originally posted by Joe Shaw: Caveat Emperor, that's what I always say. Then you are 'always' a buffoon. Caveat 'Emptor' (let the buyer beware) is the correct term as I recall from my basic law classes. Goose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalem Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Netted. Slingshot. Brief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Radley Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Originally posted by Joe Shaw: And what part of ... </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />I'll not subject the lads to the tedium of seeing you cast about for the answer like Lestrade after an obvious clue.... did you not understand? But it's just like you to score ONLY your question and not mine. AND MINE WASN'T EVEN A QUESTION! As to YOUR question, her name was Griselda ... prove me wrong without using references. Joe </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Shaw Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Originally posted by Boo Radley: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw: And what part of ... </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />I'll not subject the lads to the tedium of seeing you cast about for the answer like Lestrade after an obvious clue.... did you not understand? But it's just like you to score ONLY your question and not mine. AND MINE WASN'T EVEN A QUESTION! As to YOUR question, her name was Griselda ... prove me wrong without using references. Joe </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boo Radley Posted February 22, 2007 Share Posted February 22, 2007 Originally posted by Joe Shaw: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Boo Radley: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Joe Shaw: And what part of ... </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />I'll not subject the lads to the tedium of seeing you cast about for the answer like Lestrade after an obvious clue.... did you not understand? But it's just like you to score ONLY your question and not mine. AND MINE WASN'T EVEN A QUESTION! As to YOUR question, her name was Griselda ... prove me wrong without using references. Joe </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts