Michael Dorosh Posted August 3, 2007 Share Posted August 3, 2007 wbs sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer76 Posted August 3, 2007 Share Posted August 3, 2007 MD, if so many posters "dont get" what your "meant" to post, perhaps you should look at yourself, what you post, and your style, instead of blaming "everybody" else about how they have misunderstood you.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahger Posted August 3, 2007 Share Posted August 3, 2007 I'm not sure what's in more urgent need of a patch, CMSF for AI or M. Dorosh for I. (Sorry about the above, Michael. As the other poster said, your heart seems to be in the right place but you really should give it a rest.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanir Ausf B Posted August 3, 2007 Share Posted August 3, 2007 Originally posted by Michael Dorosh: I have no interest in discussing the review itself; mainly because I don't think it is important enough to bother with. If others want to discuss it, I'd find that interesting and might participate if I felt I had anything to contribute. I just don't see it as worth my effort given the low traffic that site gets.It's not worth your effort yet you have now devoted 17 posts to the subject, discussing every aspect of the review except what it actually says. I do give you credit for admitting you have nothing to contribute, and you did make me chuckle when you wonder aloud about the reviewer seeking attention for his blog, then state you will wait for the review from PC Gamer, a for-profit enterprise with a direct financial interest in attracting as much attention as possible to itself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Dorosh Posted August 3, 2007 Share Posted August 3, 2007 Originally posted by Vanir Ausf B: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Michael Dorosh: I have no interest in discussing the review itself; mainly because I don't think it is important enough to bother with. If others want to discuss it, I'd find that interesting and might participate if I felt I had anything to contribute. I just don't see it as worth my effort given the low traffic that site gets.It's not worth your effort yet you have now devoted 17 posts to the subject, discussing every aspect of the review except what it actually says. I do give you credit for admitting you have nothing to contribute, and you did make me chuckle when you wonder aloud about the reviewer seeking attention for his blog, then state you will wait for the review from PC Gamer, a for-profit enterprise with a direct financial interest in attracting as much attention as possible to itself </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Battlefront.com Posted August 3, 2007 Share Posted August 3, 2007 Looks like I can count this as my first locked thread since release! Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts