SeaMonkey Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 Solops, Ever heard the cliches "Looks can be deceiving"? "Can't judge a book by its cover" etc. etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retributar Posted September 18, 2004 Share Posted September 18, 2004 As long as the Cliche'..."Lipstick On A Pig"...doesnt apply!. :eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micheal Wittman Posted October 13, 2004 Share Posted October 13, 2004 "OMG" SC2 is looking good! just bought SC1 a couple of days ago. maybe i should have waited for SC2 to come out. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eppu Posted October 16, 2004 Share Posted October 16, 2004 SC1 Finland is too weak they always loos. Finnish army is too small and weak If army has 50,000-100,000 and corps 40,000-60,000 men big then Finnish troops has been 1HQ, 2army and 3corps or 1HQ, 1army and 4corps. Why? Finnish army size is 600,000 men. And Finnish troops has good skill and experience. Why? USSR army lost up 1 million men for Finnish line. They not have skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosevelt45(the 2nd) Posted October 16, 2004 Share Posted October 16, 2004 Let me guess... you're from finland,right? I don't know about the size of the Finnish army in SC2 but the Mannerheim HQ will be added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eppu Posted October 17, 2004 Share Posted October 17, 2004 Yes I`m from Finland... Finland army size was 600,000 big at WW2. But Mannerheim HQ rating must have 8 or 9. USSR last assault summer 1944 to Finland. up 350,000 man, 600 tank and 1700 airplane. And 70% destroyet for Finnish line. Finland loos up 300,000 man in WW2. USSR lost millions men 40-44 Finnish line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl G. E. von Mannerheim Posted October 17, 2004 Share Posted October 17, 2004 Originally posted by Roosevelt45(the 2nd): Let me guess... you're from finland,right? I don't know about the size of the Finnish army in SC2 but the Mannerheim HQ will be added. Darn right that Mannerheim HQ will be added Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_onepercent Posted October 17, 2004 Share Posted October 17, 2004 Originally posted by eppu: Yes I`m from Finland... Finland army size was 600,000 big at WW2. But Mannerheim HQ rating must have 8 or 9. USSR last assault summer 1944 to Finland. up 350,000 man, 600 tank and 1700 airplane. And 70% destroyet for Finnish line. Finland loos up 300,000 man in WW2. USSR lost millions men 40-44 Finnish line. It is alittle difficult to measure military success by comparing death toll ratio. Also I can't quite figure out everything that you're trying to say, sorry :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eppu Posted October 17, 2004 Share Posted October 17, 2004 Yritän sanoa sitä Suomen armeija on liian heikko ja pieni Stratagic Command 1 sen pitäisi olla vähän isompi ja tehokkaampi tulevassa SC2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosevelt45(the 2nd) Posted October 17, 2004 Share Posted October 17, 2004 Anyone speak finnish around here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaka of Carthage Posted October 19, 2004 Share Posted October 19, 2004 Composition of units in SC, are not based soley on the amount of manpower. So using the total manpower that Finland had under arms, and trying to make SC equivalent sized units won't work. Of more importance, is the number of artillery tubes and armored fighting vehicles. To some extent, your artillery tubes can be increased by the number of large mortar tubes. Headquarter units are purely based on what the designer of the game is trying to achieve. Without getting into detail, I suspect that Mannerheim in SC would be better represented in SC by a SC unit with an additional experience bar, not a HQ unit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted October 19, 2004 Share Posted October 19, 2004 Sounds like SC-2 better fix the Finnish issue, this dude wants some glory for his country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eppu Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 Glory for Finlad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lonewulf Posted November 9, 2004 Share Posted November 9, 2004 Finland indeed does need and deserve some glory. Having minor powers as playable countries always makes a game more exciting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellraiser Posted December 23, 2004 Share Posted December 23, 2004 let's have all the 22 minors playable ... a great possibility to have 1 week turns ... and, as JJR posted some time ago, skiis should be added to finnish troops, they really used skiis i mean how on earth could a game developer forget to make finland playable and modding skiis for their troops? i can understand national pride, i have a lot of my own believe me, but let's not forget SC is a Grand Strategy game and this kind of games don't go down to such details like what shoe number Runstedt had when he treaded over polish soil ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts