Cauldron Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 I'm not sure why I never thought of this b4 but i believe it could be fullproof. Split your troops ( sat 10-20%) and put them in as good a terrain situation as possible. What you want to do is get the enemy inf to fire at you while surviving as long as possible. Sooner or latter the enemy will run out of ammo and the rest of your troops can pick out the rabble in front of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanzfeld Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 LOL...... Want to play a PBEM and see if your theory holds water? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Leader Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 I've got a better method: Shoot all the bad guys, while taking as few losses as possible. Works almost every time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murpes Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 Originally posted by Panzer Leader: I've got a better method: Shoot all the bad guys, while taking as few losses as possible. Works almost every time.One would think so, but this guy might disagree with that logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Robert Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 Here's a variation on this theme: Send the sole remaining soldier from a hq unit, or, the sole survivor of a mg unit, particularly if it is german, and let the enemy expend all it's ammo in the usually futile attempt to eliminate, or break it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbs Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 From Murpes: quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally posted by Panzer Leader: I've got a better method: Shoot all the bad guys, while taking as few losses as possible. Works almost every time. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- One would think so, but this guy might disagree with that logic. LOL! You got me, Murpes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bog Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 I've devised the perfect CM strategy. Works every time. In order to win, all you have to do is not lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patgod Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 Originally posted by Bog: I've devised the perfect CM strategy. Works every time. In order to win, all you have to do is not lose.WRONG!!!!!! you might tie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Robert Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 Originally posted by Bog: I've devised the perfect CM strategy. Works every time. In order to win, all you have to do is not lose.[/quote Not quite perfect; "not losing" does not necessarily mean winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronChef4 Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. . . . .yeeeeeeeeaaaaaahhhhhh. . . . . . . . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMplayer Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 A variation is to get into a standoff shootout where your lower quality troops exchange fire with the enemy's higher quality troops. Basically, crack bullets cost more than green bullets. Then when you move your better guys in, you can win a close assault because of your advantage in higher quality ammo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warmaker Posted March 10, 2002 Share Posted March 10, 2002 Here's another way to prevent defeat: Quitting the game or not replying back on PBEM games! The minor setback is that it may prevent a miraculous, battle-turning victory that you can brag about. On a PBEM it warrants insults from the CM community. Choice is up to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts