JasonC Posted February 1, 2006 Share Posted February 1, 2006 As the headline says, I have a new style meeting engagement I am working on, CMAK used to do a fight in Normandy, that needs testing. A new style ME means that instead of a race into an empty map, the meeting part refers to gradual arrival of forces. In this case, with some already on the map. The fight depicted is a piece of the Caretan battle in June 1944. I'd describe it as only semi-historical. I'm really looking for pairs of people to play it head to head, and "blind" (not having seen the other side of the hill). I've tested it myself vs. the AI, but it doesn't really get the situation. I'll cross list this in the scenarios section if people think that is appropriate. If interested, please email me at the address in my profile aka jasoncawley@rcn.net 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David I Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Jason, Sounds good to me. Email sent. DavidI 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junk2drive Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 If it is, or is like, the one that I played, you will enjoy it David. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ng cavscout Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Jason, I tried emailing that address, but the email got rejected. I would be interested in playing the scenario, and have an opponent lined up, please send it to the address in my profile, thanks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David I Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Junk, Maybe we can give it a go after you have killed off all my Pz IV's. Bang. Penetrating hit Turrent. Kaboom. DavidI 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Dorosh Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Originally posted by JasonC: If interested, please email me at the address in my profile aka jasoncawley@rcn.net If your Royal Canadian Navy email truly isn't working, perhaps send it to me - I haven't played against Jon, Charlie or GJK in ages, perhaps I can rope one of them into it. madorosh@shaw.ca have you posted this at the Proving Grounds site? That's kinda what that site is for. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonS Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Dorosh - yep, I'm game. However, I'm off blowing up the countryside next week. Get the scen from Jason, send me a set up, and I'll kick into it when I get back (about the 12th). Jon 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoffel Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Count me in Jason,sounds promising. Henk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Kulin Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 I can do it as well. Could go up against my uncle who just got CMAK and just asked me for a set-up. This sounds pretty good. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonC Posted February 2, 2006 Author Share Posted February 2, 2006 Stoffel and Andrew, your email addresses are not in your profiles. I think I have Andrew's - if you don't get it then I have an old address. Stoffel's I don't have. Mike, in re Proving Grounds, just don't know the routine. I'm perfectly willing... Three copies sent out just now. Feedback is obviously the point. Well that and having fun. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonC Posted February 2, 2006 Author Share Posted February 2, 2006 My bad, my address is .com rather than .net. Sorry for the mix-up. NavScout, I sent to yours direct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockinHarry Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Would be interested, but H2H games take unusually long for me, due to my limited availability of net access! If you need some vs. AI testing, then send at my email that you probably still have. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonC Posted February 4, 2006 Author Share Posted February 4, 2006 Thanks for the offer RH, but I don't think the AI really "groks" this one. I've tested it and it can allow me to see basic things about forces and pacing, but it really isn't up to commanding when the plan has to take into account things not clearly visible on the map. (Also this one has lots o little flags, which the AI finds disorienting). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.