Cpt Kernow Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 These figures have been taken from all QB results submited to the Blitz ladder. Results may surprise those that pressume an Axis favourable imbalance in CMBB. All figures taken from: http://www.theblitz.org/scenarios/show_scenarios.php?game=64 CMBB: QB 1000 Points. Total Played: 18 Victories: Axis 5 Allied 11 Draws 2 Axis win % = %31.25 Allies win % = %61.1 CMBB: QB 1250 Points. Total Played: 22 Victories: Axis 6 Allied 11 Draws 5 Axis win % = %27.27 Allies win % =%50 CMBB: QB 1500 Points. Total Played: 44 Victories: Axis 22 Allied 18 Draws 4 Axis win % = %50 Allies win % =%40.9 CMBB: QB 2000 Points Total Played: 32 Victories: Axis 11 Allied 15 Draws 6 Axis win % = %34.37 Allies win % =%46.8 CMBB: QB 3000 Points Played: 17 Victories: Axis 6 Allied 8 Draws 3 Axis win % = %35.29 Allies win % =%47.05 Shows definite allies bias in victories recorded. [ January 10, 2003, 05:59 PM: Message edited by: Cpt Kernow ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cpt Kernow Posted January 10, 2003 Author Share Posted January 10, 2003 [ January 10, 2003, 05:50 PM: Message edited by: Cpt Kernow ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grisha Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Kernow, since you started this thread you can edit the thread title as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirtweasle Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Not really enough data to draw a conclusion though. You'd need to know the players for each and make some assumptions for startes. Sort of interesting though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonC Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Interesting, certainly. I notice that essentially all of the difference occurs in the 1000 and 1250 pt size QBs. The larger ones are effectively even, while the smaller ones have the Allies winning more than half, vs. one quarter German wins (the rest draws). I don't see any date listed for those - and don't quite understand some of the other date entries (1-01-00?) Tougher armor in small early combined arms fights would be my first guess at explaining the difference. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brightblade Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Originally posted by JasonC: I don't see any date listed for those - and don't quite understand some of the other date entries (1-01-00?) Tougher armor in small early combined arms fights would be my first guess at explaining the difference. The date in the scenario listing usually says when the scenario is taking place. That´s only interesting for historical or fictional scenarios, not for QBs. When adding a QB to the data base, date is usually set to 01-01-00, being the first date available. The dates of actual QBs played are not reported. But you are right, that information would certainly be quite important for a statistic like this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex Bellator Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Looks like people have been buying a lot of KVs in 1941 to me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterX Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 It might be even more revealing to find the percentage of battles won by the attacking side. Perhaps the numbers will show whether the vaunted Defender's Advantage in CMBB is a fact or a myth. One gets the impression that the more aggressive players choose the Germans when possible, so maybe. Unfortunately, coming from a ladder site, the bulk of the matches are probably Meeting Engagements. The Rugged Defense is currently holding a tournament featuring mirrored, attack/defend scenarios. It will be interesting to get the stats from that event. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capitalistdoginchina Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 The Rugged Defense is currently holding a tournament featuring mirrored, attack/defend scenarios. It will be interesting to get the stats from that event. The results are being posted here as they come in. From the results in so far it looks pretty even. RD Tourney results - Round 1 The Germans are attacking. CDIC 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtMuhammed Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Too bad the computer can't play itself. Then it would be possible to get more objective data. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.