-
Posts
3,659 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Posts posted by Vacillator
-
-
10 minutes ago, sburke said:
KIA/WIA/MIA Officer list - Google Drive
Nice spreadsheet, the first tab needs a few more entries on the left hand side .
-
To save anyone else the trouble:
Hello everybody! My previous topic was deleted, and with it my scripts. I will not describe my work here, because all the information is in the briefings. I'll just leave it here. I would also like to inform you that the third scenario is already under development. Good luck!
As you've only posted one post (this one) on the forum, I'm not sure about your previous thread? Not sure I want to download who knows what.
-
And can I ask a lazy question? Are all of those scenarios available somewhere like TSD3? I only seem to have a few of the WO files (4, 5 and 6) and a couple of the ASL ones.
-
30 minutes ago, TheVulture said:
Optimistic twitter thread from Dr Mike Martin. Anyone know anything about who he is as to his credentials as a believable analyst?
Executive summary - Russian offensive in the east has fizzled and will likely culminate in 2-4 weeks, followed by collapse
Was just about to post the same thing but reported by the BBC, who describe him as 'The war studies visiting fellow at King's College London'. So I'm not a lot wiser on who he is, but his thoughts are more in line with this forum (or at least some on this forum) than the BBC has generally been until now.
Edit: Here ya go:
-
Just now, Aragorn2002 said:
I found that site too, but I doubt they can deliver. Some sites just take your order and your money and only then start searching for the book.
You might be right about that, haven't used them before. Even if they have it I imagine the shipping cost / duty might make it unattractive.
-
1 hour ago, Aragorn2002 said:
Warsaw III : The Battle for the Magnushev Bridgehead August 1944 "Herman Goring" Panzer Division Vs 1st Polish Army
-
12 minutes ago, Kinophile said:
FIRE THE NUCLEAR MISSILE! **** you Clem Fandango!
Hang on, so our Imperialist Channel 4 comedy has invaded your territory? Okay, Russia is next.
-
3 hours ago, Gpig said:
@Paper Tiger Just wanted to pop in here and give my thanks to the author of The Scottish Corridor campaign.
Nice sentiment and totally agree. Just to say he has not been here for quite a while (almost 2 years) but hopefully he'll be back.
-
1 minute ago, danfrodo said:
So AKD, you think this is information is false? Dang it.
And Dan, what are the chances of Joe B getting his plans approved in that strange political system you have over there? My fingers are crossed...
-
7 minutes ago, Haiduk said:
UKR Osa fires at something with unknown result
Agreed, but the text says it is the downing of a Ka-52 near Kherson?
-
Perhaps a day when we're discussing housing bubbles on the 'Ukraine thread' is not such a bad day ?
-
3 minutes ago, Holman said:
Well, the whole Zimmerit Paste thing was based on a fear of infantry sticking magnetic mines on tanks by hand. Early WW2 tank design still assumed that tanks might operate without nearby infantry support.
Hmmm, some modern echoes there...sorry wrong thread .
-
17 minutes ago, Holman said:
Also, which crew member fires it? If it's the commander, he's ignoring situational awareness to do so. Was it the loader?
You can kind of see why it was dropped from standard tank design.
I imagine the loader is best placed, not the commander or the gunner. As you say not ideal whoever it is. And I'm still not sure why it was deemed necessary in the first place, was there a real/perceived history of German troops jumping on the back of Soviet tanks and the crew being unable to repel them?
-
Further thought, what was the rear MG designed to be there for? Just a spray and pray defense against inboarding enemies or a more targeted weapon?
-
48 minutes ago, Battlefront.com said:
You know, just feed the design specs into one end and out pops a chip on the other end.
Now you're reminding me of this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Soldiers
Good fun for the kids...
-
Yeah so still no fire from the rear MG, even when the grenades start hitting. After a while the turret turned, suggesting the presence of enemies was at least known but not yet spotted?
So perhaps a previously (and retained) spotted unit is needed as the target, which is a bit problematic?
-
Okay, not quite as planned but a result:
Set Target light behind to start with, turret turned. Then set it forward to get the turret forward again, rear MG was observed to fire very briefly at the previuosly spotted targets to the rear. Only fired a few shots so far, will edit with an update...
EDIT: Okay so the issue may be spotting? There were three spotted German units when the turret was traversed to the rear, this turned to one in the shot above. The shot above resulted in the demise of one poor fellow in that unit, and the unit then disappeared. No more rear MG fire after that as there were no spotted units to fire at. And before you say open up to spot, I already had and the commander had been shot. Could have arranged that better .
I can adjust the above with different units and try to save my commander, unless it already answers your question? Think I will re-do without opening up (aka commander death) and see if the rear MG then retains the spots.
EDIT 2: So yes, it seems to me that the rear MG (with or without commander alive) can not spot units. Will next try to test this with a rear end approach (ooh err) but need to make sure the turret faces the other way...
EDIT 3: approach from the rear did not seem to be spotted so not fired upon but will try this again.
-
Will do.
Does it have to be immobilized? That stops the hull moving I suppose, but not the turret...
Now to find out how to purchase an immobilized vehicle . EDIT: Okay, got that bit done. Just swapping out the Panzerschrek units for Aufklarungs - or wait, do they have PFs? I'll find out.
-
8 minutes ago, Erwin said:
If people are reporting that they very rarely see the rear MG being used perhaps that is solely under AI control(?) It's common in modern titles to see similarish examples where a vehicle will use an ATGM against some targets even when one wants the gun to be used etc.
Thinking about that, if you're manually controlling an IS-1 are you able to target with the rear MG without the tank or turret turning round? Of course you can't actually just command the rear MG to fire on its own so not sure about this.
-
1 hour ago, Warts 'n' all said:
Perhaps the rear facing MG only gets used if the tank is attacked by enemy infantry.
I tried to test this with the editor, with German troops behind and in front. Didn't see the rear MG fire but the tests were admittedly very limited in duration by the Panzerschreks I'd rather foolishly included .
-
1 minute ago, Huba said:
I don't know about conversions from standard gauge, but with sufficient lead time, maybe it would also be doable ?
I imagine this isn't easy, but it's probably do-able with lead time.
If there's 2500 minus just a few so far, then maybe not so much of a problem yet.
-
I guess not, but will try testing my friend.
IS2 tested to a small extent, seems no backward fire. Have we got an IS1? Back into the editor...
IS1 acquired, same result no backward MG fire. Limited testing for sure.
Hopefully Steve or Charles @Battlefront.com can confirm whether or not the back turret MG is modelled. I imagine not...
-
OMG, I love it. Thanks .
-
You mean here?
https://www.thefewgoodmen.com/tsd3/
I'm not seeing a download link there yet, but I'm sure it will appear in due course.
Excellent and I see you have been busy (again) .
War 2022
in CM Black Sea Maps and Mods
Posted
@BFCElvis just to bring this to your attention.