Bufo
-
Posts
754 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Bufo
-
-
27 minutes ago, Aragorn2002 said:
I didn't have a high opinion of you in the first place, but this is the limit. Can someone please quote me?
quoted
-
18 minutes ago, Howler said:
He's asking for volunteers. I'm not sure what @rocketman has done to you in the past that warrants you sidetracking his effort.
Don't stop reading my post after the first sentence please.
-
Why would I?
"Leave the bug tracking to BFC. Perhaps if you get invited to the Beta team some day then you can participate in all the bug tracking and reporting that you would ever want, but for now just go and play the game and enjoy yourself. "
-
7 hours ago, c3k said:
Can you imagine a forum with 10,000 separate threads???
I can. Here it is: https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/forums/euiv-bug-reports.813/
Currently standing at 22 792 bug reports.
-
Unacceptable is when you cannot complete a campaign. If you can, casualties doesn't matter.
Mission comes first you know.
-
I am really sorry for what is happening to you right now.
But please, can you continue this in another, appropriate thread? I would like to read about the game here.
-
You can replay any turn. This way you can complete campaigns without a single loss of anything.
Its only a matter of savescumming.
-
-
5 hours ago, OrdeaL said:
So which is correct? Tanks needing to be unbuttoned or not to communicate with infantry, we have two different answers in here. Hopefully a developer can shed light on this?
"A vehicle must be unbuttoned to horizontally share (report) information from about 9 to 32 meters.
A vehicle can be buttoned & horizontally share (report) information if it is within 8 meters of the other vehicle."
http://community.battlefront.com/topic/119474-c2-information-sharing/?do=findComment&comment=1719467
-
Whats inaccurate? I don't want to watch a video for 35 minutes just to find out.
-
Yep, one click to install, upgrades are automatic.
-
Looking for an opponent for a CMSF2 Blue vs Blue battle.
I will be playing the germans, so you need to have the NATO module. I have all the DLCs, so it does not matter which faction you choose.
- no off-map assets of any kind (including off map artillery or mortars and also UAVs, planes, choppers)
- No pre-planned artillery or Target Reference Points
- Meeting engagement
- Small- medium size
- one size larger map (for small battle medium map, for medium battle large map)
-
-
Probably it was already asked before, but I didn't find anything about:
If I own only the base game and I want to play a multi game against somebody who has a DLC and want to use a faction from that, will that work? Or do I need to have that DLC as well?
-
This is how it is with Intel cards. Search on the forum, this issue was raised many times but they cannot do (or do not want to do) anything about it.
-
Interestingly enough the newsreel says in that video that they are getting trained to use the panzerschreck. No mention of a home-made AT device.
-
Depends on what you want:
CMSF2 - hunting terrorists (USA vs peasants with rifles)
CMBS - classic warfare in the modern age (USA vs Russia)
-
3 hours ago, Aragorn2002 said:
Yeah. And the only mystery in life is why the Kamikaze pilots wore helmets....
I guess for the same reason religious suiciders do this today (getting armor on): to survive until they can hit the target.
-
STEAM RELEASE DELAYED
"In order to play it safe and give everything enough time, Combat Mission: Shock Force 2’s Steam release date has been pushed back to September 1st, 2020."
https://www.wargamer.com/articles/combat-mission-shock-force-2-steam-release-delayed/
-
15 hours ago, Combatintman said:
Or I can save myself the bother and remember what I saw.
Obviously, but we already knew that.
-
48 minutes ago, IICptMillerII said:
crazy stuff can happen, and CM represents that fairly well.
Yeah the problem with this is that we actually arrived to the point where CM becomes a religion. If anything happens, that happened because that was the intended effect for sure. This game cannot go wrong anymore.
-
22 hours ago, Combatintman said:
Well to me realism means vaguely like the real thing, hence me asking what your definition of realistic is. Your first response was another game and your latest response indicates that you actually don't know whereas I have actually seen it first hand. That's the thrust of it my friend. I certainly agree that the game's graphics aren't as good as others and there is room for improvement but what we get in terms of wagons brewing up is not overly far off the mark. If you're citing War Thunder as a source then before we know it people will be asking for 'realistic' hand grenade explosions based on what they've seen in films. As I have thrown a grenade or two in my time I know that their depiction in Combat Mission is closer to those that I see in films.
Well thanks to the year of 2020, one does not have to participate in actual tank battles to see real hits on tanks. You just have to search on youtube / liveleak /reddit /etc.
-
I also had a guy who was hit directly - and I really mean directly - on the top of the head by an airburst mortar round, and he became only yellow injured.
He was running and didn't even stop. Like nothing happened.
-
7 hours ago, John Kettler said:
the Leopard 1 lacked gun stabilization
Like the T-62, the Leopard 1 had many variations. Only the original Leopard 1 lacked the stabilization. The last one being manufactured in February 1970. All the subsequent models got it after.
HEADLINE: July 4th, 1944, Hitler Assassinated! Third Reich Surrenders to the West! [HYPOTHETICAL]
in Combat Mission Final Blitzkrieg
Posted
How about making only one product? You could load any map or forces if you had that DLC.
Like for example, modern Russia vs WW2 Germany
Like with DCS.