Jump to content

JM Stuff

Members
  • Posts

    2,816
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by JM Stuff

  1. On 2017-6-12 at 4:37 PM, John Kettler said:

    J Bennett,

    Guarantee you if BFC had done nothing but keep the game in Normandy and done nothing but provide new engines, there would be no BFC by now, for it needs to sell games, not new engines, in order to stay afloat. Gamers hunger for new vistas, new forces, new weapons, and Normandy is a highly constrained environment with tactical realities practically unique to it. Interesting and all that, but by no means a basis for long term business survival, let alone success. There was only so much BFC could do in this AO, which is precisely why it released, first, CMFI, opening up the MTO as an AO, the MG Module, and, later, CMFB. CMRT is there because the Eastern Front is and was  a big deal (people practically went mad over AH's "Panzerblitz") to wargamers, and the date was chosen so that the most popular AFVs (the heavy iron) on both sides were all in use. CMRT also allowed BFC to use German troops and gear already done for CMBN and CMFI, enabling it to focus on the Red Army side of the equation, an excellent leveraging of scarce staff and resources. I really, really wish we could have the PTO, but Steve seems totally opposed going there. So many possibilities.

    Would absolutely support AIW, which could feature such fascinating things as an Israeli squad armed with 98Ks supported by an FT-17, jeep mounted RRs, all sorts of late WW II armor (IS-2, SU-100, to name but two), early and mid Cold War (IS-3, IS-10, T-54/55.T-62, BTR-152, BTR-40, BTR-50, BTR-60, SNAPPER ATGM equipped BTR, converted US HTs, Super Sherman and Isherman, AMX-13 (Panther gun on a light tank/w ATGMs, too, M48, M113, SP mortars. Four wars to fight: 1948,1956, 1967 and and 1973, mostly fought on the wide open desert, provide rich wargaming possibilities. 

    Ithikial_AU,

    Like your Forum consolidation idea.

    Regards,

    John Kettler

    Would absolutely support AIW...

    Man ! you read my mind...?

  2. Hmm !!! would like to see what could be cmsf ii everybody talk about but dont know what could be the new face of this... one update of cmsf I ???

    Personly black see  don't have it don't like modern conflict, people's are really suffering....both side we have already enough with cruality and attentat in these mad world...like more trying to redrawing history...but this is my opinion.

  3. 1 hour ago, Sgt.Squarehead said:

    Resistance/Partisan/UnCon units for all the current CM games are probably top of my list right now.

    Resistance deserve to be in the game cos my point of view they are playing a Big role in the ww2... all plans and infos giving from resistance and number of civilians peoples to prepare Dday... without them the allied having more casualties and perhaps dday will never be.

  4. 26 minutes ago, 3j2m7 said:

    Believe me me too... and pray also one day to have possibility to see in BF M 48 chieftain Centurion and all family of 70s and 80s tanks like mentioned in a post to created Arabs Israely war...have already  some tests with the actual cmfi and a lot lot lot of imagination...

    But...not realist of course.?

    Yes I guess also the Maroko Goumiers and some others nations South Afrika Australia Greek...but also French and Italian Resistance!!

    Yes this module could be very interresting...

     

  5. Believe me me too... and pray also one day to have possibility to see in BF M 48 chieftain Centurion and all family of 70s and 80s tanks like mentioned in a post to created Arabs Israely war...have already  some tests with the actual cmfi and a lot lot lot of imagination...

    But...not realist of course.?

  6. Yeah !!! this is a mod that LongLeftFlank did and i have loading year ago and prepared a full copy of my cmbn with the name cmij (CM Invasion Japan)... and don't understand why this mod almost perfect didn't have more success and be abandoned...hope to see news about it and more people's interested and this before the new Module cos ...the way to Rome seem to be very long...Gentlemen please...a new update  is waiting have only to let him a hand...having enough knowledge to created myself sometbing correct but be ready to give my help and my best...

  7. On 2016-10-2 at 3:08 AM, Douglas Ruddd said:

    IDF was a great game, as well as MBT. I would like to see Arab-Israeli Wars, 1948, 1967, 1973. '67 Would be interesting with Israeli M51 Super Shermans vs Jordanian M47s and M48s, or M48s vs the IS3. Good mix back then of modern (for the time) MBTs vs WW2 tanks (admittedly upgunned). North Africa would be nice, Spanish Civil War to France 1940 and the Balkans.

    Just my 2 Quatloos......

    +1 73 Attak of the Bar Lev line in the Sinai... but also the Golan Heighs with the Syrian tanks and theirs possibilities to see over infra red in a night fight...i thinks somebody made already  a mod about this for cmsf...?

  8. On 2016-10-1 at 8:12 PM, Rinaldi said:

    My dream of dreams is Israeli-Arab wars of 1967-1973 and the Korean War. BFC hasn't shied away from hypothetical campaigns in the historical titles, as Gustav Line for FI showed us, and to be fair to my own delusions a '67 title would almost certainly have to drift into the fantastic to get the ball rolling. Its probably way too sensitive and niche to be anything but fantasy ultimately.

    I also don't think its very fair or accurate to deem the Korean conflict 'Pacific' in nature if we're using the common association there. If anything it would be quite a bit like Fortress Italy in terms of hilly terrain and head-to-wall smashfests for dominating ground.

    +1 See on the Battlefield Patton Centurion Chifftain super sherman.. all packages of Syrian Egypt...and all Arabs states...

  9. Thank you guy to your interrest, this would look like a staff map overlay (that i was drawing myself when I was more young) :) and have direct infos of units and limitations on the battlefield, I hope more people's would be also interested and perhaps let BF taking a view for update.

  10. 8 hours ago, Mark_McLeod said:

    No idea man sorry

    Hi 

    My part of view :

    Have making a copy of my CMBN ver 4.(that I can modidied without alterning the original game).
     
    Have loading all "basic brz files"and make a copy from all in case of mistakes I can copy the original one again.

    With the Mod tools have "unziped" brz files have making differents folders regarding to the differents modules; 

    exemples: Normandy v100A.brz...Normandy v200 Commonwealth.brz...all take lot of places and time on my hd but is necessery to dont destroy the original ones. 

    In fact have "sacrified" a full set of brz files for tests and overview.

    Have working of uniforms... exemple smod_german_m43_soldier_uniform 4

    and have writing the same name of the uniform to see what uniforms wearing the soldiers...and compare late the differents files...

    Loading the game and see "who wearing what" was making the same with helmets...and personly mods.

    In this way I can see who wear what and how much "same soldier wearing wicht uniform"...have making some notes for further...

    I can modified then all what I want without destroy the original one and when my personly mods doesn t work I copy again an original brz or modifield the files myself again.

    Hope this is clear enough and could help you...

    Sorry for my bad english.

    For more infos PM me...

    Brz details.JPG

    CM Normandy 2017-04-27 14-42-23-36.jpg

    CM Normandy 2017-04-27 14-43-31-45.jpg

    CM Normandy 2017-04-27 14-46-08-57.jpg

  11. Thank you very much nik mond appreciated your job, like every modder on the forum..

    and yes they look more better that the first version (the first one was already good), but this one has better textures ;)

×
×
  • Create New...