Statisoris Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 I noticed that the purchase costs for US rocket artillery was not changed in the patch notes. Was there ever a decent explanation given as to why the three different rocket batteries are so cheap vs their effect? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanir Ausf B Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 Looks like US rockets will still have to be banned in PBEMs. This surprises me. And no, I have never seen an explanation or any official comment on the subject. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dieseltaylor Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 Well that is downright bizarre not to change it. Perhaps some one could confirm it is deliberate or an oversight. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcelt Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 I too ,am very surprised and disappointed that no explanation or change has been made re these U.S. rockets costs. And in battles V AI they cannot be banned.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LJFHutch Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 I too ,am very surprised and disappointed that no explanation or change has been made re these U.S. rockets costs. And in battles V AI they cannot be banned.. True, however when they were used on me I found them to be quite ineffective, especially compared to Howitzers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statisoris Posted July 22, 2011 Author Share Posted July 22, 2011 Battlefront and/or Beta Testers, are you able to provide any information on this topic? Why was the purchase cost left unchanged? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statisoris Posted July 23, 2011 Author Share Posted July 23, 2011 Gonna have to bump this, I think a lot of people are interested in BF action on this issue. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomm Posted July 23, 2011 Share Posted July 23, 2011 This remained under the radar for too long! I made a bug report, just to make sure. I would be very surprised if there was a rational explanation for these low point values. Best regards, Thomm 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomApple Posted July 24, 2011 Share Posted July 24, 2011 IIRC, Steve said quite early they weren't going to chase QB unit costs. General statement not specific to this, again IIRC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.