vveedd Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 I have played this scenario many, many times in singleplayer and PBEM. Scenario is modified for WWII time period as much as it can be but still it is CIV scenario. For instance, you can buy swordsman if you want. It is stupid to do that, of course but there is possibility because of game concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fischkopf Posted December 21, 2005 Share Posted December 21, 2005 But this is realistic as well, heck the Poles invested too heavily in Cavalry. hahah, ok, I apololgize for my role in furthering this silly topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 @Weed --- Dude, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, take it easy on those tokes. @FishDumkoff --- Get it together, son. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J P Wagner Posted December 23, 2005 Share Posted December 23, 2005 Originally posted by jon_j_rambo: @Weed --- Dude, a mind is a terrible thing to waste, take it easy on those tokes. @FishDumkoff --- Get it together, son. Nice to see that you are in the spirit of the season..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vveedd Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Thanks J.J. I appreciate it, especially when it comes from such mind waste expert like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Originally posted by vveedd: Thanks J.J. I appreciate it, especially when it comes from such mind waste expert like you. Very bad to see those attacks on a legend at christmas. Get it together and be gay instead. With gay I mean happy and not that you have to take it in the ass. Gay=happy. Have a gay christmas everyone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerseyJohn Posted December 24, 2005 Share Posted December 24, 2005 Aside from which, I'm JJ, and I know I didn't make the remark attributed to me. I believe vveed is referring to JJR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted December 25, 2005 Share Posted December 25, 2005 What happened to Blashy? Anymore AARs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yogi Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Originally posted by JerseyJohn: I like the suggestion made elsewhere (probably many times) of a toggle 2D/3D choice. The nearest example I can think of is the ChessMaster series. The 3D display annoys me because if I stick the pointer on the wrong part of the saure I'm moving the piece in the next square. As I like to play 'touch move' that really ruins the game for me. The designer wiselly provided the 2D option and that's what I use. It would be the same thing here. I really don't care much for statuettes on pedastals, despite the fact I know a lot of extra effort went into making them. Glad to see I'm not alone. Actually the 2d 3d choice works well for a number of games and is used in many HPS games. I often find myself going back and forth bewteen views at times depending on how much map I want to see, what type of movement I am expecting, battle detail or just for the change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blashy Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Tiles are immensly better for tactical play. I'm speaking for SC2 here, not other games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuniworth Posted January 11, 2006 Share Posted January 11, 2006 Originally posted by Blashy: Tiles are immensly better for tactical play. I'm speaking for SC2 here, not other games. :eek: [ January 11, 2006, 04:17 PM: Message edited by: Kuniworth ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retributar Posted January 12, 2006 Share Posted January 12, 2006 CAN YOU PLEASE ELABORATE MORE ON THAT Blashy ...THAT... Tiles are immensly better for tactical play. As i myself am really unaware of just what kind of difference there really is???. Thank's for your input!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
breezeri Posted January 14, 2006 Share Posted January 14, 2006 Worst descision would be not to publish it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent Smith Posted January 18, 2006 Share Posted January 18, 2006 Something QUEER going on here! BUTT I agree with the GAY one 100% :eek: I'm so not convinced about the square v hex thing. p.s I just bought A.G.W from Schwerpunkt. The wait got to me. If anyone's interested will issue impressions accordingly. p.p.s QUEER=STRANGE: GAY=HAPPY: BUTT=TYPO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted January 18, 2006 Share Posted January 18, 2006 Decisions of SC2 that are going to suck? The game hasn't even been released yet how can you decide any of this? On a Screenshot, that's hardly a reason to make a real observation, try the game then critisize it LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 If SC-2 sux...well, it will suck. If SC-2 is good...well, it will be good. To be determined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts