Dragonheart Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Originally posted by jon_j_rambo: Bottom line: SC-2 is turning out just like SC-1, that I'm stuck as the 2nd best player in the world. My record speaks for itself. Well the difference is that in SC 1 you stuck as 3rd best player of the world ;)whilst in SC 2 you assume to be No 2. So eihter you increased your skills or one player is missing. But anyway the light is shining brighter for you now. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 DH! Come back! We need you oh and Rambo is tootin' his own horn. There are about 5-6 good players in SC2 who play regular PBEM, 3 or 4 who play IP. I'm looking for more Americans or Early Morning Germans Originally posted by Dragonheart: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by jon_j_rambo: Bottom line: SC-2 is turning out just like SC-1, that I'm stuck as the 2nd best player in the world. My record speaks for itself. Well the difference is that in SC 1 you stuck as 3rd best player of the world ;)whilst in SC 2 you assume to be No 2. So eihter you increased your skills or one player is missing. But anyway the light is shining brighter for you now. :cool: </font> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonheart Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Liam i m still on 1.0 version, stopped playing after a couple of games almost 5 months ago. SC 2 is nice but no attiction for me. But hey...i play SC 1 once again. :eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeaMonkey Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Liam, if you don't mind slow PBEM, a turn a day, PM me...I want Allies, already have a couple of Axis games going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubert Cater Posted October 11, 2006 Share Posted October 11, 2006 Dragonheart, v1.04 addresses many of the outstanding issues that were found in v1.0 and if by chance that is not enough... I think you will like the next patch as there will be quite a few additions/enhancements Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 @Liam --- Forget this PBEM stuff, lets play TCP/IP. @SeaMonkey --- Of course, AAR. I enjoy being called out, that's what life is all about. I first started talking smack in 3rd grade, playing kickball with my USA hat on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted October 11, 2006 Author Share Posted October 11, 2006 @DragonHeart --- So what games are you playing? The winter weather is coming soon, I'll be ramping up by playtime. SC-2 is a good game, I enjoy it despite Yodl owning me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonheart Posted October 12, 2006 Share Posted October 12, 2006 Originally posted by jon_j_rambo: @DragonHeart --- So what games are you playing? The winter weather is coming soon, I'll be ramping up by playtime. SC-2 is a good game, I enjoy it despite Yodl owning me. Well beside SC 1 nothing special some RPG´s here and then. @Hubert Maybe the wintertime inspires me to have look into the 5th patch....after all i missed the previos 4 so i did not have to atept my gameplay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubert Cater Posted October 12, 2006 Share Posted October 12, 2006 Fair enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt Andrew Posted October 12, 2006 Share Posted October 12, 2006 Could "Terif's Morale Exploit" be resolved with an arbitrary morale cap? Say, cap morale at 200%? Just a suggestion, but perhaps Terif or Bill could beta test the TME at various cap numbers and see what happens. There has to be a number that still represents huge morale boosts while not becoming an exploit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_j_rambo Posted October 12, 2006 Author Share Posted October 12, 2006 Yodl is stubborn with exploits, which is actually good in this case, because it will force a patch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts