Jump to content

3-4 Player Planned?


Recommended Posts

Hmmm, not a bad idea. I can see some sort of a 2vs2 possibility, no more than that. For instance, like 1000pt QB 2vs2, 2 allied, and 2 axis, split the pts 500 a piece. In this case, each guy would have command of about 1 coy with 1 or 2 AFV's.

Now for the hard part, coordinating maneuvers together. I can see it now, "You SOB, why didn't you tell me there was a enemy tank in that area". Or "Man, im just glad your taking the shellacking from the enemy arty".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 vs. 2 is exactly what I'm thinking of, and I think the element of having to communicate with your ally would be a great dynamic, depending on how it was implemented. Consider, for example, you're allowed to chat in tcp/ip or send notes in PBEM *only* if you both have functioning company HQs...

-John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally posted by MikeyD:

Hmmmm... I'm trying to remember what part of WWII had 4 different sides all shooting at eachother in the same battle. ;)

We're not necessarily talking about 4 sides shooting it up. I'd be happy to be able to command an infantry company, while my friend command a platoon of tanks.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...