Michael Dorosh Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Well, since Kip Anderson is allowed to spam the board with his wants, here is yet another CMX2 thread with a lame list of wants. http://www.battlefront.com/discuss/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=30;t=003874 I'd like to see CMX2 be really fun, with units of some kind, a 3-dimensional map with terrain and objectives. I hope the interface is intuitive and user friendly. I hope the units are realistically depicted and appropriate for whatever time frame is chosen. I can't wait, if you do all that it will be the best game....EVER I think the units involved should suffer some sort of realistic casualty assessment, and the terrain should model real life effects like cover, concealment, and impediments to mobility. I just know that BFC will do all this, and more! OH BOY AM I EXCITED. Please, please, please don't disappoint us BFdotC because I may hesitate exactly 10 minutes before shooting you my credit card info anyway and buying your next product sight unseen! (better? Feel free to jump up and down excitedly at the prospect of BFdotC yawn delivering all this....) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingknives Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Who wizzed on your cornflakes? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Dorosh Posted May 2, 2005 Author Share Posted May 2, 2005 Originally posted by flamingknives: Who wizzed on your cornflakes? Whizzed, you urine grog. :mad: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingknives Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 No, wizzed. Like Wizzard 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David I Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 Mike, "One pill makes you larger, and one pill makes you small, and the ones that mother gives you, don't do anything at all..." DavidI 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 "I'd like to see CMX2 be really fun" Dang! A request for CMx2 that's been overlooked by the Grognards! From your other requests it sounds like what you want is CMx1 over again. Y'know I agree. Anything above the present CM games will be icing on an already tasty cake, and my worst fear is the (highly unlikely) prospect that their push to be cutting-edge will spoil the recipe. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rleete Posted May 2, 2005 Share Posted May 2, 2005 You really are a sad little man. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romulus Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Originally posted by Michael Dorosh: Well, since Kip Anderson is allowed to spam the board with his wants, here is yet another CMX2 thread with a lame list of wants. Aliena vitia in oculis habemus, a tergo nostra sunt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Quick, someone say something political so this thread will get locked. I've been waiting for someone to say something interesting or amusing, and it just doesn't look like it's going to happen. Michael 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Dorosh Posted May 3, 2005 Author Share Posted May 3, 2005 Originally posted by rleete: You really are a sad little man. HeeeeeHaaawwwww!!!!!!!!!!! May I have your permission to put it in my sig? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave H Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Originally posted by Michael Emrys: Quick, someone say something political so this thread will get locked. I've been waiting for someone to say something interesting or amusing, and it just doesn't look like it's going to happen. MichaelSay something political? No chance; I don't feel like getting banned. :eek: :eek: I did want to ask a couple of questions about your sig. After some research into the matter at hand, I discovered Mr. Emrys is absolutely correct. —Bergerbitz Do you even remember what this was all about, and how long ago it happened? :confused: Strategy is buying a rubber before going out on a date. I think in this example you have confused strategy with logistics. Would you agree? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rleete Posted May 3, 2005 Share Posted May 3, 2005 Originally posted by Michael Dorosh: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by rleete: You really are a sad little man. HeeeeeHaaawwwww!!!!!!!!!!! May I have your permission to put it in my sig? </font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 Originally posted by Dave H: I did want to ask a couple of questions about your sig.Might as well. This thread is going nowhere fast. After some research into the matter at hand, I discovered Mr. Emrys is absolutely correct. —Bergerbitz Do you even remember what this was all about, and how long ago it happened? :confused: Yeah, approximately. It was about some point of grammar that I was right (as usual) about. Happened a couple of years ago or so. I guess you could search all of Bergerbitz' posts and find the thread. Strategy is buying a rubber before going out on a date. I think in this example you have confused strategy with logistics. Would you agree? No. I think the entire quote, the second half of which you omitted, provides the best example of what we mean by the difference is between strategy and tactics I've ever seen. I am very proud to have been the originator of it. BTW, logistics is an integral part of strategy, which may explain your confusion. Or it might just be all the glue you sniffed in junior high. Michael 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Emrys Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 Originally posted by rleete: Seems like just a short time ago 5600+ member numbers were the F.N.G.s, and not worthy of mention. *sniff* You're still not worthy of a mention. Notice I didn't actually mention you by name? That's how totally insignificant you are, not only within the grand scheme of things, but even in that tiny corner of upstate NY that you regularly pollute with your demi-presence. Michael 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rleete Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 My, my. Someone is bored tonight. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 Originally posted by Romulus: Aliena vitia in oculis habemus, a tergo nostra sunt. I only wish that mine would stay there, since out of my sight is where they belong. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave H Posted May 4, 2005 Share Posted May 4, 2005 Originally posted by Michael Emrys: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dave H: Strategy is buying a rubber before going out on a date. I think in this example you have confused strategy with logistics. Would you agree? No. I think the entire quote, the second half of which you omitted, provides the best example of what we mean by the difference is between strategy and tactics I've ever seen. I am very proud to have been the originator of it. BTW, logistics is an integral part of strategy, which may explain your confusion. Or it might just be all the glue you sniffed in junior high. Michael</font> 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.