_Itchy Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 Most of the new DF scenarios say "Play either side. X vs AI preferred." with no mention of suitability for H2H. Should these be read as suitable for H2H or NOT suitable for H2H? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slysniper Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 best thing to do with that is when playing h2h. The weaker player is assigned the side that is recommended as AI. That will make for the best H2H play of the battle. players will generally do better than the AI. as to game play. So in theory, the AI beefed up some to help make for a good battle. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt Joch Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 “Road to Bastogne” was designed for H2H. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vacillator Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 The two variants of Metal on metal are of course 'ahistorical' meeting engagements with fairly balanced forces even though they don't specifically mention H2H. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umlaut Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 1 hour ago, Vacillator said: The two variants of Metal on metal are of course 'ahistorical' meeting engagements with fairly balanced forces even though they don't specifically mention H2H. I've played the US version as US vs AI - and had lots of fun. But it is clearly balanced for H2H - much too easy when playing against the AI. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vacillator Posted January 30 Share Posted January 30 32 minutes ago, umlaut said: I've played the US version as US vs AI So that would be Pershing vs Tiger. I hope it's still easy as US in a H2H, as that's me . The big stuff is just about to arrive. My opponent @Ultradave is no pushover though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Itchy Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 On 1/30/2024 at 3:36 PM, Sgt Joch said: “Road to Bastogne” was designed for H2H. Yep, thanks, was just looking for something a bit smaller to compliment... On 1/30/2024 at 4:40 PM, Vacillator said: The two variants of Metal on metal are of course 'ahistorical' meeting engagements with fairly balanced forces even though they don't specifically mention H2H. ...this (Pershing) large battle that I am already playing (fun so far!). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Itchy Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 (edited) On 1/30/2024 at 3:33 PM, slysniper said: best thing to do with that is when playing h2h. The weaker player is assigned the side that is recommended as AI. Sure. In this case both pretty experienced players and not looking for anything too big or too one sided. I was just a little surprised at the ambiguity. Thanks all. Edited January 31 by _Itchy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.