Jump to content

Vacillator

Members
  • Posts

    3,388
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Vacillator

  1. 16 minutes ago, Bannon said:

    I definitely prefer playing against a human regardless of whether I win or lose. Part of the difference for me is the dialog that may accompany a battle.

    I would have liked that more than once if I could. Totally agree.

    That's confirmed then, a PBEM is on the cards in our future 😉.

  2. 1 minute ago, Centurian52 said:

    I want to face an enemy with human-like intelligence and flexibility.

    And you've ended up playing me 😂.  I am reasonably flexible.

    On a serious note I think playing other humans is the best way to be challenged.  You may or may not find that with me, but you surely will with others.

  3. 1 hour ago, Warts 'n' all said:

    Oh, dear. There are no "Brits" in this campaign. You begin with the Canucks, and then go on to fight as the Jocks. If you must use a collective to describe members of the British Army in WW2 then use "Limeys".

    Yesterday I was asked to fill out a survey, part of which was 'Ethnicity'.  Under the 'White' heading (other headings were available) I was surprised to find that I could only choose 'White British' or 'White Welsh'.  🤔.

    I immediately called Tom Jones to ask if he considered himself British. He told me to **** ***, even though I know he has quite a bit of English 'in him'.

  4. 11 minutes ago, Myles Keogh said:

    Do people make house rules about the "appropriate" use of trucks/jeeps/damaged vehicles?

    Well, that reminds me of a 3 hour long battle I played recently as PBEM where it turned out my opponent had totally crack Germans (and lots of them) against my totally green GIs.

    The endless 'be seen, be shot at, die or run away' got to me eventually and I started playing around with making roadblocks between bocage with trucks (of which I had plenty).  I sort of communicated this to my opponent.  Did it work?  No.  Was it realistic?  Definitely not, but I couldn't exit them in that game so they were destined to burn anyway.

  5. 15 minutes ago, Erwin said:

    It is wise to leave some rear area units with enemy units that are surrendering - until the system automatically removes them from the map.

    +1 to that, doesn't take long - perhaps a turn or two.

    1 hour ago, kb6583 said:

    They are still shown as 'regular' icons on the map, albeit 'Broken'.

    I assume they are showing a white flag and have their hands up?  I ask because some of the unit (which you may not have spotted) may not have decided to surrender.

  6. The area fire is certainly flying here 🫣.  It's just a game and we can play it how we like, with agreement if another human is involved. 

    Being the naive person I am, I've never even mentioned house rules to anyone but it's never been a problem.  Except for when I was sent a full page of house rules that I didn't quite understand.  That game stalled there as no explanations were forthcoming.

  7. 31 minutes ago, Erwin said:

    it's better to buy direct from BF

    That's what I've always done. 

    But it's an interesting question.  If you can buy outside Steam and get a key to run it on Steam, can you buy it on Steam and *somehow* install and run it outside Steam?  Not sure as I've never tried.

  8. 38 minutes ago, JulianJ said:

    Slightly dim question here. I have two copies of SF2 on two different drives of my main gaming and graphics computer.  I can't tell which one I am using when I play, I launch them from the start menu or shortcuts.  I want to delete the obsolete one.

    Hi Julian.  That's not actually a question 😉.

    Can you right click on your shortcuts to get the location?  And maybe do the same for the start menu?  If they all point to the same place you can trash the other one (first checking for any additional content you might have added in the Z folder etc. that might not be in your 'correct' place).

    That's probably a dim answer, forgive me if so.

  9. 7 minutes ago, Warts 'n' all said:

    It might be due to the size. When I looked at it earlier it did seem to stick on 98% for quite a while when loading. I doubt I'll actually be playing it anytime soon, too busy with  real life, and Downfall at the moment.

    Maybe, it is high on the 'hugeness scale' (sniggering and rolling of eyes).  However I've just loaded up 'No country for tanks' which is at the top of the charts in my CMBN, and it loaded without a problem.  Perhaps every man and their dogs are on map at the start of Ranville but not in No country...

    I'll experiment a bit more as I've not had a scenario fail at the first hurdle before.

  10. In other news, I'm also about to start a CW PBEM against @Ultradave.  I have never played CW, but as Dave put it 'it's what he trained for'.  Should I be worried 🫣?

    I don't think we'll need to post an AAR, I already feel something in the air... artillery 😵‍💫.  And TOWs.

  11. 13 minutes ago, Centurian52 said:

    for all I know my opponent might not have even gotten around to looking at the next turn yet

    You're talking about me now aren't you 😉?  We need a slight adjustment to our game and then it'll be plain sailing I'm sure.

    9 minutes ago, Bannon said:

    @Vacillator and @Centurian52, I'd invite you two to a Cold War or Black Sea battle over  PBEM+++, but I see you're both general officers and I'm a lowly noncom so I'm not sure how fair that would be. 😉

    That would not be an issue, anyone can beat anyone (at least when I'm involved).  What might be troublesome for me is that I'm yet to play either CW or BS.  Both of us are somewhat busy just now anyway but I'd be happy to oblige at some point once I can at least tell my RISEs from my non-RISEs (ooh err missus).

×
×
  • Create New...