Lacroix

are there any plans to improve unit spacing? for example sending an team or in worse case squad from point A to point B and ensuring they take good positions,can be problematic. Soldiers will just unrealistically try to be as close to eachothers as they can,often being on top of each others besides not looking very nice, it impacts gameplay alot. and realism. interaction between unit spacing and HE (or any other rounds) is my point tight formation, which is completely unnessesary , makes them more vulnerable to the HE rounds. now, it might be the case that HE rounds are not as deadly in the game as they are irl. which bring us to another thing: Not Realistic much in my opinion,this is a big flaw in cm games. i dont mind that much strange animations and sometimes abysimal shadows but this is one of the things that is critical for realism are there any plans to adress this,and if yes would it be @v4 or x3 engine

99% bug. there are bunkers and trenches in scenarios, dont see why wouldnt there be barbed wires

how do i set 'quick ' or 'fast' for example on keys 1 and 2 ? they are linked to camera views and it wont work anyone

leme know if you are interested in Real time multiplayer

only thing that we have is chat while battle is going on , by pressing ` buttong bellow escape. a decent lobby with clear and usefull interface and player names would be super awesome,one that can be turned on without turning on actual game. something steam-like but on a much smaller scale

what do you mean

got tired of pbem and wego, yes it has its positive sides that we all know but today i realised its not the only way to play the game (same post in cmbs/cmbn) positive sides of Real time: u can cancel orders (pretty simple fact and everyone who knows this game , knows how good is this and* realistic in most cases) Pause available : 1) where you cant issue orders 2) where you can 'adrenaline' , idk about you but my heart beats faster when my panter's turret is rotating and aiming at sherman, and while i am waiting to see will he shoot first ,and then what will happen if he gets hit and all that stuff or when you have 1 platoon waiting to cross the street but you see enemy movement and duuno what to do in the moment and u send whole squad to death. those stories are different from the ones in wego/pbem because you are not completely relaxed while living them , you have to decide fast sometimes and it just feels more alive what i am thinking about is a tiny or prefferably small, maybe Medium battle that would be set to end in 1 or 2 hours (Custom battles/quick battles) iam not sure about pause rules yet, if there are pauses timer will be set to 1h for small battle or something like that, if there are no* pauses or its very limited for emergency cases, then 2 hours battle to give us room for thinking since CM is not very optimised/smooth game Wego that is set to 45-1h actually lasts (not pbem) 2 hours or more sometimes , so its same thing in theory if anyone is interested send me a message on this forum and we ll play when we both can dont worry about losing or winning

Copied from my other post, cant type again same thing: got tired of pbem and wego, yes it has its positive sides that we all know but today i realised its not the only way to play the game positive sides of Real time: u can cancel orders (pretty simple fact and everyone who knows this game , knows how good is this and* realistic in most cases) Pause available : 1) where you cant issue orders 2) where you can 'adrenaline' , idk about you but my heart beats faster when my panter's turret is rotating and aiming at sherman, and while i am waiting to see will he shoot first ,and then what will happen if he gets hit and all that stuff or when you have 1 platoon waiting to cross the street but you see enemy movement and duuno what to do in the moment and u send whole squad to death. those stories are different from the ones in wego/pbem because you are not completely relaxed while living them , you have to decide fast sometimes and it just feels more alive what i am thinking about is a tiny or prefferably small, maybe Medium battle that would be set to end in 1 or 2 hours (Custom battles/quick battles) iam not sure about pause rules yet, if there are pauses timer will be set to 1h for small battle or something like that, if there are no* pauses or its very limited for emergency cases, then 2 hours battle to give us room for thinking since CM is not very optimised/smooth game Wego that is set to 45-1h actually lasts (not pbem) 2 hours or more sometimes , so its same thing in theory if anyone is interested send me a message on this forum and we ll play when we both can dont worry about losing or winning

i have cmrt cmbn and cmbs. i can play any, u choose

sure i should be free in the morning from 10am , untill 5pm (cet ,central european time) every day, thats how it is in the last few days, but i probably can sometimes be free in the evening aswell

i am aware of unrealistic part of 'issuing orders and canceling in real time' but in small battles i think it beats wego in realism (tiny/small)

got tired of pbem and wego, yes it has its positive sides that we all know but today i realised its not the only way to play the game positive sides of Real time: u can cancel orders (pretty simple fact and everyone who knows this game , knows how good is this and* realistic in most cases) Pause available : 1) where you cant issue orders 2) where you can 'adrenaline' , idk about you but my heart beats faster when my panter's turret is rotating and aiming at sherman, and while i am waiting to see will he shoot first ,and then what will happen if he gets hit and all that stuff or when you have 1 platoon waiting to cross the street but you see enemy movement and duuno what to do in the moment and u send whole squad to death. those stories are different from the ones in wego/pbem because you are not completely relaxed while living them , you have to decide fast sometimes and it just feels more alive what i am thinking about is a tiny or prefferably small, maybe Medium battle that would be set to end in 1 or 2 hours (Custom battles/quick battles) iam not sure about pause rules yet, if there are pauses timer will be set to 1h for small battle or something like that, if there are no* pauses or its very limited for emergency cases, then 2 hours battle to give us room for thinking since CM is not very optimised/smooth game Wego that is set to 45-1h actually lasts (not pbem) 2 hours or more sometimes , so its same thing in theory if anyone is interested send me a message on this forum and we ll play when we both can dont worry about losing or winning

i think theres no way i could convince< people who think that intervention was a good thing , > that intervention was not a good thing. i ll say again 0% first hand experience 0% of understanding of the conflict Sources: wikipedia,Cnn,fox ,bbc (poor sources) and to some extent some of you are biased since you live in america or Nato countries (that region) .i am starting to think that serbians are not that bad after this thread. i thought you people from west were more reasonable.seems like you are just like serbs, just didnt have a war to experience.. and war to make you more violent/nationalistic (unless you count overseas counter insurgency and meddling in other countries affairs) i will refrain from responding on this thread since its pointless, whatever i say you will just say: ' serbian ability to kill' + ' intervention was needed' + ' some personal stories you heard' + ' cnn news broadcasts' repeat again and again, baseless 'stories' and you mix it with 'logic' you opened my eyes a little bit

one example of making difference: bombing trains full of people. yes its needed from strategic point of view perhaps, but so are actions of serbs and albanians justified then. its needed for their* strategic gains. everyone equal right?

disclaimer: aurelius wasnt born in a car or anything similar,he wasnt refugee. he said ' Stories Like' meaning, other people stories. (source: me, we live in same street almost) now i am not sure if someone from his family was killed during 90s (far family) i understand your point but its only one way of thinking.i dont see it more valid than for example ,putting blame more on albanians.its just choosing which side of the event sounds more 'right' repression was present, but % of repression is VERY important.also repression can be provoked. sure,not saying they are guilty and serbs are not guilty, but scale is more around 50% 50% guilty as i said before to someone else, what would you do in america if something happens like this. or something similar (edit) its easy to judge governments across the sea and point out their flaws and i say again, i dont like serbia at all . i 'd rather live in west africa for that matter,at least its exotic. i am not defending serbia/serbian government, but i also cannot agree with what some people here are saying,cos simply its not true long story short: poor claim strenght from all of the people who are more on the albanian side, or view USA as least evil. basically or view albanians as less guilty. i ll call you ' westerners' for the sake of simplification , but i know it might not be fair term for most of the people here

in my book news are not history.just news specially some news like CNN they can get out of context,be half truth or pure lie. or truth all you have is weak claims and general talk

i dont see how this is relevant. nor important. shes just a comic book character, and keep in mind, i criticize myself for that to some extent, and you will never do that (criticize yourself) or if you want, i am a retarded nerd turd sexist maniac who hates everyone, but still, how is that relevant to this thread? (i didnt break law at least , so sorry to dissapoint you , i wont be punished) besides thats ad hominem, not that i am 'feeling unsecure and bad' because of those attacks, i just dont see it how it helps you in your argument i was talking about you your tendency to subtly support murca more than other countries when it comes to ' whos less evil' that is relevant to this thread,and i think i saw it in this thread aswell. problem is that this field is like a jungle, you can say that saying X in thread Y is not what i think it is ... i know its trench warfare

i must refuse to look at serbia as a less valid country than U.S.A if you had equivalent of albanians in usa ,what would you do? be realistic.kosovo is like 10% of serbian internationally recognized land. Terror and terrorists are magnet for armies, armies that will come to try to destroy them Serbia was more capable of killing to some extent and thats why on paper you ll find more non serbs dead. even that is discutable tho.. but what does it matter 8 000 or 18 000 , one side will sometimes inflict more death on another, just cause its physics. one important thing. dead Albanian terrorists tend to represent themselves (or other people do that for them,like most of the world and most of the albanians ) as civilians , numbers are tricky. i am not saying all of them were terrorists, i am saying just keep that in mind and most importantly, i didnt see any real infromation from you. a strong case and abundance of your personal knowledge about this conflict. all i am hearing is general talk (not trying to be rude, english is not my native language, i dont posses ability to fine tune my tone when talking, that you do when you are talking in your primary language, and i lack many words)

i ll double check that, i might be wrong. certainly you are not saying ' murca best everyone else die' but subtle things are revealing kinda, to me at least

i lightly insult comic book characters (actually that was only one in my life that i 'insulted ' ) and you heavily insult other people in a thread that has nothing to do with comic book characters. there are different ways to insult someone. but it seems there is no difference in your book and my quoted previous post is not insulting anyone, i choose words carefully

what hes saying. you cant just pick one and say ' this one's more evil' based on what? Cnn and your logical thinking + wiki? i used to troll wikipedia of famous 'singers' from serbia and write stupid stuff, wikipedia is funny imo, not good source of information it doesnt work like that,specially for these ' butthurt nationalistic themes' steve posted something here about Franjo tudjman. he concluded that hes not a nazi. sure he didnt call himself nazi, but his actions were 'nazi' (even tho i dont like bashing nazis that much) steve said: 'Not to mention contrary to the facts. Franjo Tuđman, one of the founders of the HDZ, was elected in 1990 as president of the Croatian republic while it was still part of Yugoslavia. In WW2 he fought against the Germans and their Croatian puppets, then became a general under Tito post war. Hard to qualify him as a Nazi.'' his sentence looks logical to you all , and it would look logical to me too, if i wasnt from this area. i duuno how to explain this but this 'logical' sentence is just not true its easy to get tricked it looks good on paper, but reality is different many years passed since ww2. and its not clear how hard he fought against germans and WHY and when exactly* , keep that in mind.< i am not saying hes nazi in a black/brown shirt, i am saying his actions were Nazi-like (negative meaning in this case) you think he'd be dumb enough to say ' i am a nazi' ? his country was croatia not germany , and trust me , Croatia is to some extent a fascist state. Not 100% fascist, but a decent amount of population is fascist in Reality (they dont wear flags nor have tatoos on their forehead ' i am a fascist/nazi' )

what i am seeing here ,from people like sublime,panzer and other ,basically from people who are pro america , to the reasonable extent is: ' everyone's bad but were just less bad' and also ' its clear that X did more killings and Y did less killings and X is more guilty' while offering 0 evidence and even less evidence that is 100% Clear undisputed Evidence edit: for every your acusition against serbia i have 2 to throw at croatia/albania. its endless circle and not productive at all

i agree. it was matter of time. either by war or diplomacy but what i am saying , and Aurelius is that americans single handedly sided with Albanians, without any knowledge of the situation, OR intentionally. honestly i don't know which one is the case.

''''Kosovo's objection has more to do with who's friends with who. The behavior of the Serbian military pretty much 1993-1999 is on the road to terrible, and we're ready to remember the agony of sad that the Serbs went through during the bombing, but not the well filled ditches the Serbs left from Croatia, through Bosnia, and beyond. All the Serbs had to do is stop shooting civilians, and there wouldn't have been much of a leg to stand on. As the case is the region is a lot more stable today, and there's a marked downtick in violence. And Kosovo isn't a US territory so there you go. '''''' (note: land in 21st century doesnt need to be conquered on a political 19th century map) i duuno about other stuff, but i am from serbia and i am ethnic serb. and i am not nationalist, i am anti serb , i am often disgusted by our traditions , i think its pointless and brainwashing-ish. i like western europe but, you are wrong situation in our country back then was to say the least very complicated. its , (very loose term) something like war of the clans. you have many factions during the time. and listen now, NONE of them are good and NONE of them are bad Albanian unrest started in the 80s , or even earlier. but 80s are the starting point of this story (kinda simplified story) , it wasnt that much of a big deal, you know unrests happen but not many people at that time thought it will be War... we must see things from their (past) point of view (their: people in the past) you have quazi communists/socialist or whatever they are, you have albanian nationalists, you have Serb nationalists and many other factions. and most of them are dumb as ****, on both sides (plebs) simply put, there are interests of Albanian nationalists, ethnic albanians and to some extent extremists, problem is , sometimes its hard to differentiate who is extremist and who is not, who is for* extremists and who is not and how much do they support certain idea at the given time/region, its VERY VERY complicated. 3 people playing board games @ basement can get into fight , not to mention province/state where there are milions of people... AND you have serbian moderates ,nationalists and extremists.. its a ****ty mess so their interests (albanian): have their own country/Join albania,or get bigger autonomy Serb interests: keep kosovo (since its heart of serbia and all that bull**** , even tho its true thats where serbia WAS dominant , now its not , due to ww1 and ww2 and other events ) on other hand you have Milosevic who is "neutral' and want to perserve things (the president), but in reality he kiiiinda secretly does things to benefit ethnic serbs since he sees things are eventually gona get bad, but how bad ? Albanians are those who are attacking status quo,that must be clear, back then Our country was Recognized by the world,everything was legit. Terrorist attacks started, small or big doesnt matter you will say , ''they started because albanians were supressed'' but that is not a honest answer , do you Really think you know who throw the first stone? its a multidimensional situation/problem, you cant just put it into linear box. theres lots of propaganda on both sides, and honestly, you cant know the truth by watching ,well one of the Not so credible News : CNN , 25 000 km away somewhere in atlanta **** happened, on both sides , but on a multidimensional level (Where,how, what,why,Reaction to previous event, wrong conclusions ,wrong translations of the actions etc etc etc ) you know your country (State) is very famous for ... well ... strange inconsitencies right? so is every country at one point in time, but just keep that in mind when talking about informations and clinton and other ... ' loving' people. i think its safe to assume that clinton doesnt (didnt) give a **** about serbs nor albanians. or at lest its more realistic saying that it doesnt matter what he 'thinks' , he can say he did it for humanitarian reasons, or for the money , it doesnt matter, his opinion is irrelevant. So far Evidence has shown that there are no bad/good guys, only dead/alive guys

is this a bugg?