Jump to content

Chudacabra

Members
  • Posts

    380
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Chudacabra

  1. On 3/20/2017 at 1:30 PM, IanL said:

    I think this post speaks to what we really need to consider - points cost. People seeking to dump down vehicle X's capabilities or beef up vehicle Y are going about things in the wrong way. The vehicle / system capabilities should be modelled like in RL. The balance of QBs needs to be in the points not in tweaking capabilities. Those that are arguing that the US capabilities are too strong because they always beat the Russian forces are barking up the wrong tree.

    I agree. All three armies in CMBS have their strengths and weakness, but these need to be balanced with extra points in QBs depending on the circumstances. I think tactics matter a lot more in this game than anything else. People seem quite obsessed with tank spotting capabilities, although I'm generally of the opinion that a guy with binoculars should be doing the spotting first then directing a superior number of tanks against the enemy accordingly. Of course that doesn't always work out as intended, but if it did then this game wouldn't be any fun.

  2. 2 hours ago, Ivanov said:

    Try some realistic, "real life" setup: slightly more numerous, tank heavy Russian force, some vehicles with APS, drones, laser guided arty and a battery of Tunguskas vs less numerous mechanized US forces, no APS on the vehicles and the laughable SHORAD just like in the reality and tell me who wins ;)

    I recently played a huge PBEM as the US against an attacking Russian force with a +25% bonus. The lack of any AA assets beyond Stingers for the Americans was a serious problem. His helicopters accounted for most of my tank loses. I unwisely opted for more tanks without APS, when I should have bought a smaller number of APS Abrams'. I did managed to destroy all my opponents T-90's and his Khrizantemas, and knock out something like 30 BMP-3's. Still, I was eventually overwhelmed by numbers, copious amounts of support weapons, and my own tactical failings.

    CM%20Black%20Sea%202017-02-04%2015-59-31

  3. 2 hours ago, HerrTom said:

    It's been 2 weeks and I haven't really heard anything about this game from my buddy.  I'm afraid it may be dead.  Plus side is that I'll finally get to upgrade to v4...

    Sorry everyone, I was just as excited to see how it plays out!

    Ah shucks. Do you plan on releasing this as a scenario?

  4. I think this is the most challenging small scenario in the game. I had to try it a few times before I got a victory. I used scouts with tight cover arcs to figure out where the Ukrainian armour was, and used a lot of area fire on the near side of the highway to clear it. I used the machine guns on the BTR's to keep heads down and tried to pack as many men as possible into a building to gain overwhelming fire.

  5. 1 hour ago, HerrTom said:

    I'd love to upgrade myself. The improvements seem pretty cool, but I don't want to force my opponent to upgrade and I'm not sure what will happen if we upgrade in the middle of a game.

    When my opponent and I upgraded to 4.0 in a PBEM, we got two turns of weird smoke that looked like explosions then everything straightened itself out. All other features worked fine.

    Your opponent doesn't seem to be making much use of area fire, which is probably the BMP-3's greatest strength. Does he have any dismounts spotting?

  6. On 12/24/2016 at 4:43 PM, Battlefront.com said:

    Most likely, but no guarantees.  We do not perform any specific tests to make sure things will work or not work.  Sometimes a particular tweak won't be activated for a game already in progress, but that's not a big deal.

    Steve

    Everything seems okay in a PBEM, except that smoke has turned into explosions. I shudder to think what kind of horrible cancers the pixeltruppen will suffer from after inhaling such nasty stuff.

×
×
  • Create New...