Jump to content

Chudacabra

Members
  • Posts

    380
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Chudacabra

  1. On 5/30/2018 at 11:11 AM, IICptMillerII said:

    I actually think that makes the scenario more interesting. One of the main disparities between NATO and OpFor nations is in optics and sensors. This battle does a good job of illustrating that. If anyone has ever read the book "Team Yankee," this battle reminds me a bit of the night attack the Soviets launch against the dug in Americans on the hill. The author describes US infantry firing using their night vision, and the Soviets firing at the muzzle flashes because they lack night vision. There are plenty of real world examples of course as well.

    True, true. I meant more that it does not seem particularly realistic for you to win this battle against a human as the Syrians with no night vision. Give 'em hell though!

  2. From a quick battle of crummy Ukrainians vs. crummy Ukrainians. No Oplots, drones or APS here. Paying extra for Bulats seems to have been worth it. Mechwar '77! These forces are making me really look forward to Red on Red battles in CMSFII.

    gOZynPM.jpg

    7U7wFtM.jpg

    Smokey/fiery Bulats.

    akbqoXO.jpg

    Opposing forces. I destroyed four T-64's and two BTR-70's for the loss of three Bulats. The next turn should be interesting.

  3. 5 hours ago, Michael Emrys said:

    There is actually a way to do that indirectly. If you want to increase the point allowance for the defender, just increase the size of the engagement at the beginning. Then you can use all those points or only some of them until you get the force size you want. And you can do the same with the attacker until you have the balance that you seek.

    But I agree that it would be nice if you could simply set the point allowance directly as you pick forces.

    Michael

    But I want BIG battles!

×
×
  • Create New...