Jump to content

DLaurier

Members
  • Posts

    324
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DLaurier

  1. Here is a link to a series of documentaries about the Russian front, it's called Soviet Storm and covers some of the major battles of that theatre, IMO the best computer generated images of a WW2 battlefield yet, lots of details about tactics and the conditions the troops and civilians had to cope with, highly recommended.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wheGNXA5ryg&feature=related

    The english subtitled version was called "Great War".

  2. I find that off map artilery tends to fall everywhere except where you want/need it, and frequently it falls on my own troops.

    On map is little better, I've seen on map guns target my own infantry off to the side rather than the enemy straight ahead.

    It's almost cute watching a 150 mm infantry gun rotate away from the point you aimed at, and fire at the infantry squad behind it instead.

    It's also the only time artilery is accurate.

  3. Hi all,

    Apologies if this has already been discussed - I haven't the time right now to do a search. I was just thinking, it is not at all implausible right now for NATO to be dragged into an invasion of Syria, for the reasons I shall outline below.

    Firstly, the Syrian crackdown seems now to be completely out of control. Reports are coming out of Syrian soldiers being shot in the back of the head for refusing to fire on demonstrators. If the reports are true, even soldiers firing deliberately over the heads of demonstrators are being executed on the spot for disobeying orders.

    Secondly, the Turkish president is apparently furious over the situation because he was given assurances in person by Syria that there would be no excessive use of force against unarmed opposition elements.

    Thirdly, Turkey is now having to contend with thousands of Syrian refugees streaming over its borders.

    Fourthly, Turkey is a NATO member.

    Here's how I think it could go. Faced with a humanitarian crisis on its border, Turkey sends forces into the border area of Syria to establish a safe haven for Syrian refugees so they don't have to cross into Turkey. Syria responds by attacking those Turkish forces which have entered the country. Turkey invokes article 5 of the NATO treaty, which says that an attack on one member should be considered an attack on all, requiring other signatories of the NATO treaty to come to its aid. In response, NATO quickly organises an expeditionary force to help police the Syrian border area siezed by Turkey. End game: NATO forces build up in the border area and then drive on Damascus to depose the regime, which is now viewed as having no legitimacy and as posing a continuing threat to a NATO ally.

    What do you think - could it happen?

    It would more likely run as follows.

    Syria keeps defendng its soverignty as a state.

    NATO decides to conquer Syria.

    Syria is invaded and recolonized.

    The Syrians realize too lae who their enemys are.

    and Yes, I'm guessing Syria is next on the list of former colonys to be recolonized.

  4. Riiigghhhtttt.... I'm gonna jump up into a storm of bullets, then plunge down to the ground over 2 metres below... and I'm gonna do this wearing 30 kilos of gear???????????

    I dunno what they taught you at Potsdam, but I'm parking my arse next to the rear door.

    When that order to dismount comes, I just pull the handle, let gravity open the doors, and roll out into that nice little safe zone at the back.

  5. The driver, Mac, was a hefty guy. Even without his left torso, he still weighs over 200 pounds. I think the turret crew are trying to keep everyone else alive while the radio/bow gunner, Donald, cuts Mac into smaller (more easily lifted) chunks with his pocket knife.

    Once Mac is out of the way, Donald will take over driving.

    Uh oh. Donald's knife just snagged on a bit of tendon, and closed on his knuckles.

    This might take a while.

×
×
  • Create New...