Hueristic

LMAO While the iberian front is settled, the Italian fleet ruduces the port at gibralter to rubble and passes through to park itself off the atlantic coast of US. When the US enters, the Italian fleet is waiting for him, all MPP from italy is used for subs to put into atlantic via gibralter. What do you call this?

Nice job glad u shared this info. I had to find it all out the hard way Lol. I'd recommend anyone wanting to challenge terif's game print this out and keep it handy, He's one tough SOB. Some day i'll get a win against him. Before i die. Well maybe.

Nice job glad u shared this info. I had to find it all out the hard way Lol. I'd recommend anyone wanting to challenge terif's game print this out and keep it handy, He's one tough SOB. Some day i'll get a win against him. Before i die. Well maybe.

Against a human the entire concept is flawed at inception. Any player worth his salt inflicts soo much damage on the Ictalians fleet before they even move that they run for cover on thier first turn. Sup all popped my head back in for a minute

LMAO sorry man i always enjoy your posts and by and large they are the most informative and factual of any i c regarding history but this statement is beyond streching the truth Lol.

LMAO yes i can attest that you do not cheat that is very true i've seen some of your guys get some real bad luck on your turns. Speaking of our ongoing testing Where is my turn this mornin? I'm sitting here with coffee in hand and no enemy to plot against. I even answered Terifs call to battle. I'm not awake enough for that kind of beating.

Lol good one If Hubert used a persistant Seed then turns would give the same result no matter how many time reloaded. He should do that for SC2

I like Jet/long/Ind and then anti-tank. Lol post in the opponent finder forum and i'm sure someone will show it to you There are many gamey ploys some get more annoyed by this one because it cannot be initially countered.

Correction Hueristic: Won 2, Lost 3. Draw 0. Won v/s cruzzer won v/s waltero lost v/s terif 3 times

You are loseing site of the scale of the game. There is no way to sneak up a army through an enemy country period. You can send one to harry behind the lines but it will become unsupplied and do nothing more than become unsupplied and cost the enemy some operational costs to counter. Don't lose track of the size of the theatre. This is not a tactical scale.

LMAO

double post. stinking connection sux [ February 18, 2003, 05:33 PM: Message edited by: Hueristic ]

You can say that again.

Has run fine since reboot was just wondering what it meant. Checked out the dump file and it looks like it was critical system error generated by the effiel engine. No need to PANIC i guess Lol

SC.EXE: dumping core to generate debugging information... SC.EXE: PANIC CASCADE: unexpected harmful signal -- Giving up... What's up with this? Got it on during first turn watching axis move. Entire system went unstable and had to reboot. This system is normally Super Stable. Music Match jukebox and nothing else besides systray in memory on win98 lite. [ February 19, 2003, 09:35 AM: Message edited by: Hueristic ]

This is incorrrect as it is only territories that The allies start with. One's that are aquired dureing gameplay do not count.

Well said as usual Jersey I second the motion

Man your setting yourself up with that one lol As you get older and alsiemers sets in they are gonna own the house. Lol

Nope i don't think i've ever seen more than 1 french naval unit stick around. You got the save? I'd like to see it.

Yeah i got a Nephew that's 10 and he comes over evey friday(He has no living parents). I play any games he wants and he always wants to play SC. Course it starts giving me bad habits not useing gamey moves on him Lol.

Lol you think that is what makes Bushs policy? The only thing making his policy is his Ego/Views/Desires. Saddam has been makeing him look like an idiot and he can't deal with it. I'd love to just put the both of them in a room and Beat the **** out of whichever one of them walks out.

I was a "Master of disaster" When i was in and we had a saying that was. "Napalm Burns little kids too" And that's the fact jack. I'd hate to see a bunch on children killed because Our president is a POS that needs to fix his Daddy's mistake. What we need to do is Bomb every Palace Bunker Complex at the exact same instant into dust. I'm sure we'd get that Scumbag without all the collateral damage. He needs to be removed there is no doubt but bush is doing it the wrong way. And the worst thing about it is Bush continually lie's to us about the reasons like we're a bunch of morons that can't see through his Bull****. What's more is Anytime We enter a country we should ANNEX it as a STATE. Eventually we will have on world Government. I'ts gonna happen eventually there's nothing we can do to stop it so it might as well be our form of gov if we gotta do all the fighting. Rebuilding a country then giving it to some bull**** faction or warlord or setting up a gov that's gonna get toppled by the military is the worst thing we can do to the iraqi people. But i seriously doubt Bush's administration cares about the innocents that are gonna die. That is what he in Saddam both have in common. Bush is gonna be the first President Voted out of office During a war. Watch He''l make sure we are still in a War for Re-election time. And don't forget your Duct Tape.

LMAO never heard this one!

LMAO. Lol u never cease to make me break out in a laugh I'm not sure if anyone will get him. The one game i thought i had him was my second time ever playing axis i was kicking butt but snuck a finish unit behind his lines to harry and activated siberian army! Damn i didn't know a size 4 unsupplied corp would send the entire Mother russia Eastern Defence to the rescue! Got a little depressed at that. Part of my game is probing for weaknesses and exploiting them. Not haveing to cover inner russia i think is a major flaw.

That has never been in refute since it's inception. the issue is the time involved in setting one up and running it. No-one seems to be willing to make that commitment. Zap spends a considerable amount of time maintaining that thread and I for one wouldn't do it. If someone were to setup a "site ladder" then i'm sure we would all use it and ZAP would appreciate the break. IF your willing to do it then i recommend Useing the link HUBERT posted in the Ladder Thread. Also anyone that goes to these length's should send an email off to hubert to safegaurd the admin signone for the ladder in case after setup they lose interest in the game. Then the reins could be passed to the next "Exuberant" one.