Jump to content

Janster

Members
  • Posts

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Janster

  • Birthday 08/03/1974

Converted

  • Location
    Norway
  • Occupation
    working class

Janster's Achievements

Member

Member (2/3)

0

Reputation

  1. Considering the main cause of concern for Russia now is China, I'm quite sure they will have to adapt their quantity tactics, for quality themselves, and they cannot hope to match China man for man. Its ironic that during the entire 'cold' war, most of the russian troops were deployed towards china.. It's always been weird to think that russia needed more land...considering what they got..even in their diminished form now... However they have a VERY hungry neighbour, who would love siberia for themselves Janster
  2. Close assault ,is a thing of WW2.. Engineers might have C4 charges, but I seriously doubt engineers today will charge tanks.. Mostly you just wait for AT support Janster
  3. Shrug, I tried the beta... But I got quickly tired of rebuying troops ad naseam as they got constantly wiped in barrages.. Way way way too much artillery and nukes flying about in that game for me. Otherwise the consept is sheer brilliance... Online ww2 persistant front with Combat Mission unit system anyone... Janster
  4. Hm I remember this too..I had a hill with 2x SU 122 and 2x SU 152... Upon seeing a column of PZIV, they retreated...down the hill towards the enemy ...got shot and ended up burning against some houses... It was very funny. Also, the words that include 'thanks' are to be used after we see 1.03 imho. Janster
  5. Wow, Elmfudd. I think he proved a point, and that you just basically got your ass handed to you. Haha talk about bitter child. Janster
  6. Very poor review, even in a review technical sense.. don't like it. Janster
  7. Sadly NO here. I have yet to be able to play a single battle as its way to choppy despite being played on a beffy machine. But I Guess its because I refuse to rollback drivers as I don't have time for that really. I will wait ever so impatiently. Janster
  8. Focus on direct download sales...being present on major gaming sites(wargaming in this case) Know that most pirates who download your game would never pay for it in the first case.. And you can rest assured that the game will sell as much as it would sell without piracy. Then its all up to the quality of your game imho. Janster
  9. well... I still can't play the game, its on my relativly good pc completly unplayable..not to mention the sacrifice of QB points buying in favour of a totally screwed up TOE system which is just as unrealistic (4 squads 14 cars ????) I paid good money for this game, and not happy..is that ok with you? Janster
  10. Not convinced no... That the map looks deserty, doesn't mean you got Sahara under there.. The countryside might still be very much green. Janster
  11. Well, honestly I still have the feeling the devs actually haven't looked at real pics of the place. It just doesn't look right. While I don't think the country is all lush as above pic, its NOT all sand desert at all. Considering this is actually in places considered VERY fertile soil aswell. Janster
  12. Yeah, now I just wish the makers of this game saw these pictures before they envisioned the desert that they think Syria is. I've been to Lebanon ,and it was not even remotly deserty... Our vaunted game however is mostly desert ...desert..and desert.. BOOORING.. Janster
  13. Bah, I bought the game, and after a few days of trying to play it, I gave up and shelved it. I feel that when a game makes that impression, it needs HELP. I'm a fan of these types of games, but not even I can see the fun factor here sorry. I will try it once with every new patch, but its most likly gonna die a slow shelfdeath It's a shame they didn't stick to what they were good at . Janster
  14. When a game is 'this' broken....a few months is not the wait time.. It's more like a year or so... Bought space empire V a good while ago, its up to patch 30 or so, and STILL not playable by far Janster
×
×
  • Create New...