Jump to content

Soddball

Members
  • Posts

    3,497
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Soddball

  1. Originally posted by Snarker:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Watson & Crick:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Snarker:

    1335.gif

    Maggot. Spellbound won't install in Firefox. The JS console says there's an error with 'preamble' being undefined, and the sites owner says no one else had that problem.

    I managed to install it just fine. maybe there is a conflict with another extension? What other extensions do you have loaded? </font>
  2. It surprised the hell out of me in a scenario I was playtesting yesterday, using a reinforcement group light tanks carrying infantry in a flank attack down a gully to behind my positions, then proceeding to whip the snot out of my dug in Panzergrenadiers.

  3. I've just been playing a desert scenario with British Shermans, and I have a question.

    Assuming that the model shape for the Sherman III is correct, why is the front turret armour 76/0 when there is plainly a turret armour slope? Not only that, the 75mm gun mantlet is curved, the MG shield is curved, and viewed from above it's hard not to conclude that the turret is curved, too.

    Will CMX2 look again at the stats for the Sherman?

  4. Gee, thanks Snoozer. Where's the :mad: ? Where's the Deranged, Molten TNT? I know your idea of a fun 'thanksgiving' is spending it in a dark alley with your pants round your ankles, being diddled by a long line of lonely, warty-todgered old tramps, but you could have put some angry TNT in!!

    GARAHHRGGRHAGRHGHGHGARGHARGHHARAHGHGHHHG!!!! extra_mad.gif

    For that, you receive a setup - a scenario depot scenario. I picked sides by dint of flipping a coin.

    :mad: Prepare to be slathered in Molten TNT, Maggot Lips!! :mad:

  5. Originally posted by Watson & Crick:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Wallybob:

    Geez, some strong storms came through last night and this morning. All ok here. Turns out. All not ok there.

    Bah.

    Since we are winding down our current match, would you be interested in trying Sluttywanker's new waffle scenario? That is, if he actually playtested it for reinforcement bugs.... :rolleyes: Perhaps he could send it your way so you can pick the sides... Judging from Sluttywanker's last crotchety post, me thinks he is jealous of Wino's locks. Wig-wearing wombat

    :mad: :mad: </font>

  6. Originally posted by Axe2121:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Soddball:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Axe2121:

    Soddball's been sniffing paint thinner again. :mad: The mad scientist of the CM set has dreamed up another doozy with Cheery Waffles.

    :mad: :mad: :mad: Angry TNT Chuckers Unite!! :mad: :mad: :mad:

    How many lots of reinforcements have you had so far? </font>

  7. I tend to make my HMG cover arcs as wide and long as possible if they're something like an MG-42 or M1917 or Vickers. Those MGs have ammo to spare and can reliably hose down most infantry, at least persuading them to keep their heads down.

    The US MMGs and the 50 cal don't have enough ammo to be useful in that way, so I use them to support advances by individual platoons rather than as a defensive tool. The 50 cal I save for nailing halftracks and Marders.

×
×
  • Create New...