Jump to content

Ts4EVER

Members
  • Content Count

    302
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ts4EVER

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I have a playthrough of that campaign on my channel. It is not terrible, but feels rather generic and uninspired, with lots of samey missions. The final mission is a slap in the face, since the briefing misleads you into thinking that you are supposed to solve the scenario in the historical manner by rushing your forces through it, when in fact that is basically impossible.
  2. That is why I only bought that pack after the battlepack came out. IMO the quick battles do not offer the best CM experience.
  3. Yes, that is my main criticism of the Red Thunder game (as someone who avoids the quick battle system). Many of the scenarios get a bit samey. "Take that bridge with your T34s / T70s"! Sometimes some SU76s as well. I don't think I have seen one of the heavy assault guns or the SU85 ever, and the IS2s only in one campaign scenario.
  4. Hmmm... do you think it is a good idea to do that? It is one thing if you communicate this here and I totally see your reasoning, but if you include these campaigns in an unfinished state, you are technically releasing a faulty or buggy product. Not every customer browses the forums and will be able or willing to get this information. I'd be careful with that from a marketing perspective.
  5. It is almost a running gag on my youtube channel that may snipers always have 0 confirmed kills at the end of each scenario...
  6. In December 1944, the Germans had 179 Infantry divisions. Of these, 56 had 2/3rds of their line infantry platoons equipped with StG44s. A further 10 had a third of their strength re-equipped.
  7. That was the segregated Division? I never heard about them having unique gear. On the other hand, the FSSF used the Johnson LMG, so that might be a possible addition.
  8. That document is not from 1945, but captured then. You can find this information for English speakers here: http://www.wwiidaybyday.com/kstn/kstn131v1sep44.htm
  9. Hello,

    I noticed you are part of the 'Forgotten Hope' series...I remember there was a 'Forgotten Hope' Stalingrad Mod (Red Orchestra 2) a few yrs ago, but can't remember.

    Where can I find more info on the latest of 'Forgotten Hope'.

    Thanks, Joe

    1. Ts4EVER

      Ts4EVER

      We have nothing to do with Red Orchestra. This is out webpage:

      http://forgottenhope.warumdarum.de/

  10. I never saw the PPS42 ingame either. That being said, at the scale and graphical fidelity of Combat Mission, the difference would be completely unnoticable. I work on the BF2 mod "Forgotten Hope 2" and for reference, this is how the PPS42 and 43 look in our game:
  11. Are you sure about the PPS42? Because I seem to recall one of the Battlefront staff writing in here that it wasn't ingame, but that they removed it last second because they found out it was not used in the central part of the front.
  12. Are you living in some kind of bubble that doesn't allow reading? Nobody is arguing that all rifles should be replaced by StG44s, but as I and others have demonstrated, the Germans did issue this weapon in bulk and by the end of the war, it was a common weapon to see in frontline infantry units. So there should be Volksgrenadier Companies with 2 assault platoons outfitted largely with StG44s. This, btw, is already the case in Final Blitzkrieg, so I am wondering what you are arguing about anyway....
×
×
  • Create New...