pritzl Posted April 8, 2001 Share Posted April 8, 2001 There is still the problem of the crew never suffering losses while still with the vehicle, even during catastrophic explosions, but that is relatively inconsequential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grunto2 Posted April 8, 2001 Share Posted April 8, 2001 <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Are there loads of people out there buying 10 of these and kicking butt?[/QB]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> hey i resemble that remark. ==laugh== either those or the 7/1s... and throw in pupchens and 75mm recoilles and you have lots of cheap german firepower. andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olle Petersson Posted April 9, 2001 Share Posted April 9, 2001 Hi all I just tried the multi SdKfz 7/2 concept in a couple of QBs this weekend, and it wasn't very successful, at least not for an attack. I lost several to artillery, mines and 75mm Sherman HEs... In a fairly open terrain it's very difficult to get off flanking shots at the enemy. Major revelation (at least to me): These vehicles weren't soft, but did have some armour. Not a lot, but still... So adding a little armour to these vehicles could very well be realistic. (Then it's another story how CM models the effect of light armour...) Cheers Olle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mfred Posted April 9, 2001 Share Posted April 9, 2001 Here is a winner, 1000pts of Churchill VIII ( 7 off ), 1000pts of 7/2 (21 off ), result is 3 abandoned Churchill VIII and 21 destroyed 7/2.( A dead flat playing ground and nothing to be seen for 800m ) We need to talk about those Churchill's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts