Jump to content

Role of the Baltic States


Recommended Posts

I read your lengthy "flip side to the coin" dissertations, what I never saw was you actually address certain points I questioned.

 

But you keep telling yourself how "intellectual" you are and how "ignorant" people who disagree are.

 

But we are in complete agreement that this is a waste of time.

Edited by kaburke61
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russia would be better letting Ukraine go although that might come at the cost of some of the Russian speaking regions. Dual nationality for Russians and Ukranians within the current borders might al;so be part of a negotiated solution. The rest of Ukraine has quite a lot to offer the EU - prime agricultual land and an educated population. If all the old industry has gone (it would likelyy go anyway) Ukraine has the oppportnity t build a modern economy.

 

Russia of course will lose out on that and on any chance of becoming a part of the European Community at any time in thje forseeable future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is really tiresome from the Putin-bots, is the notion that this is somehow a US-caused problem.

 

Gee...whose tanks are in Ukraine right now? Funny, I don't see any M1A2s (or American troops), deployed currently, I certainly see a few Russian units.....

 

And, how was Ukraine wanting to pursue agreements with EUROPE, America's fault.

 

Typical "It's all America's fault" parroting from the propaganda-brainwashed Putin-bots. After all, NOTHING Russia ever does is it's fault, it's ALWAYS somebody else fault..the poor Russians, they just want peace so badly!

I think e are all capable of recognising as Putin-bot  when we see one. If it looks like a Putin bot and acts like a Putin b then it probab;ly is a Putin bot! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If not us, who? Putin is the one aggressively de-stabilizing Europe in a country with nuclear weapons. Isolationism is never a good strategy. Wasn't it you who brought up the west's behavior regarding Hitler, is somehow that strategy now okay when applied to Putin?

 

Not us. That's who. For starters, the assumption that the west has the right or responsibility to police the world and its affairs is as old as the 16th century. It has a poor track record if working out for anyone except westerners. On top of that, it's predicated on the assumption that affected peoples are unable to determine their own futures and that they need rich people to do it for them! Considering the huge protests that erupted in Russia last week over the death of one of Putin's political enemies (which he undoubtedly had a hand in) I think Putin may be starting to face more resistance from his own people than the west. So I could be wrong about Russians not viewing Putin with skepticism. Ultimately Russians have far, far more right to reign Putin in on this affair than we do. 

 

No, the strategy is not applicable to Putin. It's apples to oranges. You want to talk about about a historic parallel that makes no sense, it's definitely comparing Hitler to Putin. 

Edited by CaptHawkeye
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I don't think you can make a legitimate argument that it is up to Russian's to reign in Putin when Putin is active militarily in Ukraine. That ship has sailed. Like it or not the west is part of the international community and has both a right and a responsibility to act. You can self flagellate on your own time. I will not get mired in some self loathing argument that says because the west makes mistakes too, we can not therefore have anything worthwhile to contribute. Show me the nation you feel has hands clean enough and the capability to act and maybe we can talk. I doubt though you have anyone in mind.

And yes Hitler is an appropriate historical figure. He was an aggressive dictator fanning the flames of Germany's sense of being wronged and acting to "protect Germans wherever they may be". Tell me why you think there is no historical parallel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I don't think you can make a legitimate argument that it is up to Russian's to reign in Putin when Putin is active militarily in Ukraine. That ship has sailed. Like it or not the west is part of the international community and has both a right and a responsibility to act. You can self flagellate on your own time. I will not get mired in some self loathing argument that says because the west makes mistakes too, we can not therefore have anything worthwhile to contribute. Show me the nation you feel has hands clean enough and the capability to act and maybe we can talk. I doubt though you have anyone in mind.

And yes Hitler is an appropriate historical figure. He was an aggressive dictator fanning the flames of Germany's sense of being wronged and acting to "protect Germans wherever they may be". Tell me why you think there is no historical parallel.

Yes, I see Hitler as a possible parallel but also similarities with Bismarck

Edited by LUCASWILLEN05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I don't think you can make a legitimate argument that it is up to Russian's to reign in Putin when Putin is active militarily in Ukraine. That ship has sailed. Like it or not the west is part of the international community and has both a right and a responsibility to act. You can self flagellate on your own time. I will not get mired in some self loathing argument that says because the west makes mistakes too, we can not therefore have anything worthwhile to contribute. Show me the nation you feel has hands clean enough and the capability to act and maybe we can talk. I doubt though you have anyone in mind.

 

 

Look, your own attachment to the preconceptions of western culture as automatically right and automatically superior are simply not shared by most of the people currently living on this planet. The correct answer is not to go "well that's just how it is" because that's willingly ignoring a problem you now tacitly admit you have knowledge of. But I mean how is it even possible to talk about this when you don't frame it as a discussion but an "argument" as if we're in a court of law. I've been doing this forum shlocking for too many years to avoid realizing how divorced from reality it all is. I'm sorry you don't see it. 

 

And yes Hitler is an appropriate historical figure. He was an aggressive dictator fanning the flames of Germany's sense of being wronged and acting to "protect Germans wherever they may be". Tell me why you think there is no historical parallel.

 

Tell me how their is one. No really burden of proof is on you. You're going to need to connect more dots here than just "tyrant who played on people's fears".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are welcome to be the apologist for inaction and espousing the "poor misunderstood Russia" line. I am gonna stick with the UN charter as the basis of international relations and obligations. Russia doesn't get a pass for feeling like it's neighbors have to make all their decisions based on what is acceptable to a wannabe empire. Western culture LOL gimme a break. Next up -"You don't understand autocracy is just the way the rest of the world finds to be a better form of government." That is so patronizing. We used to call it white guilt. No idea what the hip turn of phrase is now.

As to the comparison to Hitler, I gave several examples of the similarity and you quoted them. That you choose to ignore them is your business, but don't pretend I did not provide them.

Edited by sburke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are welcome to be the apologist for inaction and espousing the "poor misunderstood Russia" line. I am gonna stick with the UN charter as the basis of international relations and obligations. Russia doesn't get a pass for feeling like it's neighbors have to make all their decisions based on what is acceptable to a wannabe empire. Western culture LOL gimme a break. Next up -"You don't understand autocracy is just the way the rest of the world finds to be a better form of government." That is so patronizing. We used to call it white guilt. No idea what the hip turn of phrase is now.

 

 

Which is, ya know, not what I said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, catching up on this thread.

 

Guys, this is descending into political bickering over which "side" smells prettier. Let's not go there, OK? Keep the conversation directly relevant to Combat Mission, or I'll have to lock the thread. Thanks.

 

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...