Jump to content

Rice

Members
  • Posts

    137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rice

  1. 38 minutes ago, Battlefront.com said:

    The features Slitherine has asked us to put in require lots and lots and lots and lots of testers.  Waaaaay more than we can do with our traditional method of testing.  Fortunately, we know exactly where to find people who want to help out.  A lot of people :D

    Does that mean we will be able to participate in this testing? As in we I mean the forum member.

  2. 2 hours ago, The_Capt said:

    BMPs, which are little monsters with those ATGMs and cannon.

    I know APCs and IFVs will play a massive role in this game, and honestly I expect the BMP-1 to outperform the M60A1 in most cases haha. My question was specifically about tanks obviously. Thank you for the super detailed reply. I appreciate it. It's interesting those both forces have a fairly similar composition is terms of ratio. When I play the U.S. I'll definitely be scared of BMP-1s as much as tanks in many cases.

  3. In the typical CMCW scenario, how many squads per one tank is common? From what we've seen so far it seems like vehicles will be playing a massive role in this game, obviously the modern titles work like this too but after the Beta AAR it got me wondering about the average tank to infantry ratio. This probably depends on the Nation/Faction as well. And beyond CMCW, historically what would this ratio look like? Regarding Soviet formations, it seems like a Motorized Rifle Company typically has a platoon of tanks attached to it.

    If anyone knows anything about this, it would be interesting to know more about.

  4. 48 minutes ago, MikeyD said:

    attack on Palm Springs. ;)

    I mean, if it can be added, it prob should in my opinion. Considering that the design thesis behind CW is for it to be a sandbox, more options to the map makers / players = more goodness in my opinion.
    If there is still time I recommend rethinking the decision.

  5. 17 minutes ago, MikeyD said:

    firefights usually occurred at just 80-90 meters.

    Honestly you can just look at SF2 to see what the effective ranges are going to be. The small arms in CMCW will be p. much identical. The US are theoretically a little more effective at range due to the M16A1 having a 20" barrel (Opposed to 14.5") and the M60 is in 7.62x51 as well.

  6. 2 hours ago, MikeyD said:

    Hopefully the manual will spell it out clearly. There's also no in-game way to tell which flavor of 105mm APFSDS is being fired either, though its obvious the M60A1s are firing tungsten core while M60A3v and Abrams are firing DU.

    Since it's going to be consistent to every vehicle we will just have to keep our notes / memorize prob.

  7. 19 minutes ago, MikeyD said:

    After playing a couple scenarios you'll be less enthused about engaging ground targets with your AA assets. Because nothing's worse than hearing the sound of overhead aircraft while you AA unit is reading 'empty'. :o

    True, but I need a "demolish building immediately" fire solution.

×
×
  • Create New...