Amadeus

Hubert, my game partner will send you what is needed. We reloaded the turn and already go ahead in our game. So no big deal. Thanks for your quick response Amadeus

"Failed(draw_unit_selection_highlight on map surface) Segmentation Violation" That is the message that appears when making a WaW turn after 3 game years without problems. Any idea how to solve the problem. Do anyone know about this. Regards Amadeus

Hey guys, maybe you are intersted in good AAR's from the big tournament, some of them in English of course. Have a look here http://www.panzerliga.de/dt/docs/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2795&highlight= or here http://www.panzerliga.de/dt/docs/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2794&highlight= or here http://www.panzerliga.de/dt/docs/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2797&highlight=

Ok, let's try it. Here the final draw in big http://www.panzerliga.de/dt/docs/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2792 And here is my first round match AAR with Epic and Pacestick (from Australia and thru battlefront to panzerliga) http://www.panzerliga.de/dt/docs/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2794

Is it possible to make the jpg a bid bigger?

Hi guys, we are ready and start with 25 players. Terif is our chairman. So we have (maybe) the best WaW-Players from Australia to Canada and of course the best chairman . Only 5 really German participants have signed in. I will give you some information occasionally.

OK guys, here is the draw of the WaW-Tournament without players at the moment. 2 places of the 18 are free and maybe you wanna sign in. It would be interesting to have some AAR maybe here in the Forum. Regards Amadeus from Panzerliga ( heiko.haupt@versanet.de )

Panzerliga is a German page and only a few players there have Pde (No localisation), sorry. But I tell you what. If not enough players will sign in for Blitzkrieg I will help to organise a Pde-tournament on battlefront. I have different sorts of a tournament draw for 12 or 18 or 24 players and will have some time to write to players. Only the skill of the players here is a problem for me. I don’t know who play good or less and a pair of veterans in the first round is not good for the tournament.

At the moment we have 14 participants for the WaW Tournament and 5 participants for Blitzkrieg from Europe and overseas. Every player can make at least 2 games and it is really fun. So if you wanna sign in send me a message.

Hy guys, the German Fansite for Strategic Command 2 is planning a big Winter Tournament. And we need some participants. - Blitzkrieg or Weapons and Warfare - Fall Weiss - Mirrormode PBEM (Online possible) If you like to take part you may email me at heiko.haupt@versanet.de and please give me a hint what (Blitzkrieg or WaW) you wanna play. We planning to start in early December. Kindly regards Amadeus (from www.panzerliga.de)

Oh, I think a list of cities will be very helpfull. Than you may see all productions and units in the city, too.

Mmmh, yes and no. Research is always very expensive. So it makes sense that you have to pay more than once. If you catch a goal in one area the next goal isn’t for free imo. But yes it might be a good idea that intelligence breakthroughs could come in any area of technological development because of spying out the enemy.

Yes that's right. Sorry, I misunderstood that.

Sure? I have a printed Manual. Not this big but a real Manual of Strategic Command European Theater.

Unfortunately there is no real statistic about economy in the game. So a short question to anybody about Fall Weiss. After surrender of Poland Germany gets 110 mpp. 7 Cities (70 mpp), 1 Capital (20 mpp) and 1 mine (20 mpp). Low Countries and Denmark gives me another 16 mpp each. But now France. There are 3 Cities, 1 Capital and 1 mine. I expect 56 mpp but I get only 39 mpp. What have I forget to take in mind?

Oh, sorry. I load it with the wrong engine. Take Pde and not Pacific which it must be.

I have loaded the East Asia scenario from the repository and soon got an error from the very beginning. What does this mean? [04/05/2009 8:39:31] FAILED(reset_maximum_surrender_mpp): Segmentation violation [04/05/2009 8:39:31; 5.1.2600; 1280x768x32(1); v1.02] FAILED(on_menu_command): Segmentation violation

I play Strategic Command and the other parts of the game for years now. By playing my last turns I recognize how much I go deeper and deeper in a virtual world that I really like. I like my armies and tanks. I like the clearly arranged map and the most efficient interaction I know in any strategic game I know. Really really good work from Hubert!! What I now thinking about is what comes next? Maybe you already know it because of StratCom Design Challenge. Or is there maybe something new? I mean I would love to see that Hubert makes a slightly new stuff. A more tactical war game or a build-up strategy game like civilization. This comfortable feeling in a virtual-real world is screaming for another platform too. I hope somebody feel similar and know what I am talking about.

A question about WaW 1.06. Is it correct that a German Tactical bomber is replaced for a German tank? As I see in 1.06 now one additional Tac Bomber is given to the Germans. I don't like this change. Sometimes there are about half of all units air force units. Seems to be unrealistic to me.

Oh, I see. I only want to rise the supply and dont know how. I have an attachment in zip. Big pictures are not allowed in the forum. But maybe you can watch and have an idea to solve my problem. To your questions: Yes to all. Estonia is independent, a city and a Industrial Centre but at level 5. And, Yes there are a estonian HQ aswell as there are foreign friendly troops to receive better supply. Clipboard02.zip

Hi guys, I made this script: { #NAME= Estonia Capital #POPUP= #IMAGE= #SOUND= #FLAG= 1 #TYPE= 2 #AI= 0 #COUNTRY_ID= 18 #TRIGGER= 100 #SEASON_FLAG= 0 #DATE= 1918/05/01 #SOURCE_POSITION= 6,18 [1] #DESTINATION_RESOURCE= 6,18 [10,10] } In my mod Estonia is isolated and only have a supply about 5. From here (Estonia) some units of the major allied power will start to conquer. But I want a supply level from 10 and not 5. This supply script do not work. Please help. Amadeus

Done. Sent it already to you.

Hi guys, anybody of you know this error. It comes in a normal game after several turns without any problems.

I see! The special note is important to know of course. What if this single unit moves through the position and not on 58,40 in this example?

Yes! Now it works. Thanks. But I still have problems to understand what this line really means #CONDITION_POSITION= 58,40 [0,0] [1,1] [1] [0]