Codename Condor

Im interested in joining the euro team

i guess i need another email, as soon as i open a new 1 i'll let u know. i'm a bit rusty at the moment but count me in , the ryder cup sounds fun.

good info here but unusable, i cant see how u can take manchester without london, u need the supply to go for manchester. In my last game i took london and russia readiness increased a lot even tho i had 5 corps in poland from 44% to 99% in just a few turns, so beware with the new bid system (1:8, 1:10) russia can win the game alone once UK has fallen.In my game only spain joined axis, terrible handicap maybe its interesting to wait till november to get romania and the other.

Ive jsut tested and u r right nothing to do with sonar or advance subs, i just remembered how the AI attacked my subs with UK subs and i always thought it had to do with tech development, now i see its only a nice advantage hubert have given to AI subs, also it works with axis subs BUT as i say only the AI can do it. weird.

uk subs can attack other subs (without surprise) thats because they have sonar level 1, german subs cannot.

Yep, retired would be the right word here, i just got tired but i still think this is "the game", maybe ive just played too many games. Ive fought memorable battles and had a big time, so i want to thank every tcp/ip player i played with for their fight and for being available no matter the time. I will be back someday when i feel "the game" again and hope to see you there. I now play fast tcp/ip chess games and as rambo says im still a clone copycat, just doing the same movements all the time, sicilian defense, ...some1 else invented some centuries ago. And ive never been a forum fan, but this forum is so great that i got hooked and began to partipate, i still come here from time to time to read some threads, now i see that although my previous post about u rambo, were kinda a funny stuff, my lasts posts had degenerated far beyond a decent point, sorry for those inappropiate things i might had said about u, but i guess a man like u could cope with it. So long, fare thee well Pip, Pip, Cheerio! We'll be back soon! -from Oliver!-

Well, its been a while, but everything remains the same: rambo openning another stupid thread, now 'the Legend' is asking only for a few sea hexes despite the very well known problems with memory stated so many times in the forum. And you already know no more patches are going to come. Way worst than a little brat. We know who u r, the newbie's-pain-in-the-ass, the dumb-player-legend-pretender, the lobotomized-knock-knock-is-there-anybody-in-there-fella u can meet in most forums.

hmmm, i bet 5 bucks for AI. Expert level i hope!!

Just bring the Uk med fleet to defend england and sealion turns an easy and fast Allied victory. Even, combined with a couple of free french troops u have been able to save and even 1 french BB if u r lucky and of course u havent disbanded it previously. Players shouldnt risk an all or nothing operation such as Sealion without reading the opponent strategy. Before deciding the early end of the game u need to search the med for uk fleet, to guess how many french units the allied player has transported to england, and of course the price uk has spent trying , if so, to defend france. Once analyzed all of this u can decide whether the operation should be carried out with a high porcentage of success. Players that ALWAYS launch such an ambitious op. will always lose against players that knows how to counters while it could be an easy and fast victory agaisnt players that dont do it properly, the question is are u a gambler or u read the game and try to guess the posibilties? is it feasible or not? My experience tells me that Sealion should never be carried out unless u KNOW all the uk med fleet is wandering in the med, and uk have tried to defend hard france, wasting a lot MMPs, that way all u have to do is to attack with italian navy and with german planes and sink as many ships as posible just before france falls and sealion will surely succeed. In other cases its a suicide.

Panzer Shaka was referring to problems with memory in the game engine, i think Hubert has said that he couldnt make a bigger map for that reason.

Geeze, it was 1 of the few threads i had opened and i didnt remember! :eek: Queue Production & Pool of units (limiting units for each country)

yep, it was discussed some time ago, i think it was shaka who answered me about a problem about this: it involved memory capacity, something about having redundant info (differents types of the same unit) and the problem of memory Hubert was facing, for example, with the map size. I cant remember the thread title.

rambo racial thing? :confused: I knew u werent gonna be able to get it, sigh. And please, forget about that USA vs Europe thingy, i do like USA. Nice try again to confuse, trying to bring some racial and countries phobias here? Geeze. Gunnery Sergeant Hartman, Drill Instructor: There is no racial bigotry here. I do not look down on niggers, kikes, wops or greasers. Here, you are all equally worthless. Where u from private rambo? Holy dog ****! Idaho? Only steers and queers come from Idaho, Private rambo. And you don't look much like a steer to me so that kinda narrows it down.

Heuristics Then, I really think that kind of thing should be implemented in SC2, everything that restricts cheating has my support. JerseyJohn Well, i guess yer right and this has become kinda a battle, if we can have some laughs in-between i think they are welcome, glad u enjoyed some of the jokes but not as much as i enjoy yer posts.

Nice try, tryin' to place me in the same knack that others guys that have previously confronted u? I have nothing in common with kunnyworht, jo-hans, tobby chung, freaking charlie chan, and what they called u or accused u i just dont know. All u say is nonsense instead of telling me if those weirds disconnections happens only in games against me or with other people too, in the middle of turns or just after u press the end turn. What i do know is that u previously accused terif of that FOW thing (glad to be in the same knack here lol), but jut basic maths m8, if u have X money to spend and u spend Y money in battles then u have Z=X-Y money to buy a single chit in tech and then post&whine about having crap scientits!!! LMAO, easy to guess even with FOW, aint it?. And please dont be so naive as to make relationship between CRACKING a game (FOW) and just save&disconnect in the apropiate moment, u dont need a grade for the latter. Potential cheaters (rome invasion, wins at all cost...) plus disconnections at the end of the turn means 'DANGER: U R POSSIBLY BEEING CHEATED' and i DO say POSSIBLY, but that possibility is enuff for not playing u again, i didnt accused u of it maybe its just the second option, yep, the golf&sexual thingy. JerseyJohn, u r The Light Master!!!, maybe the evil dark has ways to confuse even the cleverest minds!! that flatters me!! , i didnt know this issue was previously used, i thought i was being original but great pic!! MR. WHITE For the past 15 minutes now, you've been droning on about names. Toby... Toby... Toby... Toby Wong... Toby Wong... Toby Wong... Toby Chung... ****ing Charlie Chan. I've got Madonna's big dick coming out of my left ear and Toby the Jap I-don't-know-what, coming out of my right. Condor A Band Apart Company, SA. Europe, 2003.

Correctamundo! as JULES WINNFIELD would say. COS & SC, this have been debated a lot in this forum, and i am positive about including some of the COS features in SC2, weather and production queue are the most important issues that should be included in SC2. Complemented by a new sub warfare vision and a new strategic bomber vision and random/% initial placement of minors troops. The politics press option wouldnt fit well in SC2 and it depended a lot in luck, we can live without it. And would be nice to see some windows poping up with events and that kind of things.

Good idea, i like it. I also would like the new INTEL research and use it to be able to find out if that troop is a tank a corps or a HQ.

Bill well, i wouldnt like to be punished by the adms, i dont think im gonna say anything for that to happen, just fightin' the dark side i am (i dont get the peas&carrots expresion, friends u mean? could be, he has to abandon the dark path hes following for that to happen ) I havent tried the 1940 scenario, in this kind of games i want to develop the axis or allies forces from the very begining, 1939 is Da Scenario!. But its true what u say. Conrade Trapp It can be done. U save, u press end turn, window shows up, u dont get any advances, u pull the wire off yer puter, u post in the forum, my diap-up bumped again , try this ip.., u load the saved game, and u have another chance to develop something. Im saying is highly suspicious, not that rambo is doing it, but hes always disconnectin' when i play him, i mean a lot of disconnections. A real crap dial-up connection would get disconnections in the middle of the turn also. Rambo only gets disconnected AFTER he has pressed the end turn . Then u go to the forum and u post some posts complaining about the luck in tech, nice alibi. What i think is that people using the Rome Invasion are also potential cheaters, man, they try to get any posible flaw of the game. What will be the next thing they probably do?

Light&Dark never worked together, i have to fight against the dark manouvers of the Dark Side what are menacing the balance of power of the forum, the archi-villain, insidious rambo of the Sith, should be erradicated. Condor 'light lord' Anno domini 240200

what glory am i looking for, legend ? Of having discovered a move that kills the game? lol, all im lookin for is have some fun with a fun game and with a human opponent. Tho i prefer to play the AI that to arrange a game to use the Rome Invasion flaw. Not yer case. You post yer defeats promptly!!! geeze, congrats!!! Oh, what a big man u r!!! Now, a warning for people out there. Everytime i played rambo, he manages to ' get disconnected ' every now and then. Last time i played him, four times in less than 2 hours. I never gave it a second thought but well, hes been complaining and whining about his luck with tech (the real truth, he invests in only 1 chit, 2 maximum, the rest of MMPs are wasted in battles). This is the scenario. Well, he never disconnects in a middle of a turn, nope!, it happens always at the end of the turn. I think he gets so upset about not having discovered anything he wants another try and shuts the game down. ROFL. The other option he do have a crap&selective dial-up connection and spends all his money at golf (the only way he can put something in a hole). Condor laughin' at jjrambo. Anno Domini 2003.

Just tell me what is false of what i said, u talking about 'crying' ,well, thats false, i beat u with u LC gambit in less than 4 months and i beat u again playing this time allies with LC turn 2, in less than 4 months, yer games dont last too much, aint it?. What i did say to u is that if u were going to play again like this warn me cause i wasnt going to play, i prefered to read a good book. And the game we are actually playing is already won, dont know if uve realized..., even tho i missed conquering LC, then u came whining about terif-clones when i was conquering minors at light speed...man, so sad. And please, i give u the presumption that u know how to read, i posted that Rome Invasion in March, now call it as u want. i just dont give a damn but im not callin it RRI as i discovered it long time ago. My previous posts concern also about people that use that move in online games or are willing to, ive made my statement of what i think of that move and people willing to use it. Players trying to beat better players by means of a flaw, so sad. Game over in turn 6, kewl, it takes more time to arrange a game that to play it and what newbie trying to play online for first time is gonna be willing to play again?. And about the clone issue. You just dont know how i play, ive played few and of course shorts games with u, terif its the only 1, ive played almost 20 games with him and ive made all kinds of moves, terrible moves in the beginnig, better ones later, and i always enjoyed the games, the fact is that in the last games we had developed such a good techique to take minors i had to use iot against him if i wanted something and i have been close to win him a couple of times. EVERY player is copying the best tactics, in the begining nobody knew how to take Norway and Sweden properly, now almost everybody is using the sames moves, are they clones? of course not. Yer game is chaotic, weird moves, wrong strategy...So, please, dont be telling about other people tactics and please review yer strategies.

Zapp You are a good player i wouldnt expect people like u using it. The Rome Invasion cannot be avoided and knocks italy out of war without a single move, plus plunder, plus end of game... I can stand the other issues they dont afect my final victorys. The carrier-air bug (1.06) was much more important than all of those u mention and we still had good & balanced games.

Stop callin it the 'Rambo-Rome-Invasion' the guy is gonna think he has discovered something! :eek: web page Date: March 14 If any move at all is gamey then that move is GAMEY. i just cant comprehend why any1 would do it, well, except some crappy fellows. Let em try it, he would know the type of players there are out there and no1 would play em.

rambo U still wanna stick with that name? how was that? 'Rambo-Rome-Invasion'?? take this: No more R-R-I Date: March 14. ZAPP Zapp, i proposed a home-rule for Rome-Invasion, i supported the US-Invasion rule, they are flaws, and they shouldnt in any way be used. But, the riga-invasion and the long range-HQ ussies are not flaws!, i know u get angry if a HQ is destroyed but as i told u, that is a human fault, u didnt take care. The Riga issue is annoying i admit it, but i can live with it. They are VERY different issues, i hope u can see that. I just dont care about house rules i play the players i think they are playing fair, if one player makes a move such as the Rome-invasion against me i dont play him anymore. If rambo is using some moves i dont think to be fair i tell him to advise me if hes doing it again, cause in that case im not playing him. If terif tells me he doesnt like some kind of move i did i just dont do it anymore, if i find they are annoying as I did.

First of all, my way of conquer italy in turn 5 can NOT be stopped, i used this: canadian army, 2 french armies, 1 airfleet, 1 bomber, 2 corps, 1 carrier, if i dont remember wrong. And the chances for sucess were very high, i would say about 80% in 1 turn, 100% in 2 turns, i cut off rome supply with 2 corps (thats what they are for) so if rome corps is killed in turn 1 but u have no more units to enter rome(80%) all u have to do is wait to next turn and move into Rome (100%). As i posted in the other thread, shame on u, u cant fall lower than this. During the following days of my first thread about the Rome gambit, as u call it, i was afraid of hearing, even suffering, that some player was using it, as no1 used it i understood no1 was even trying to develop it, but well, i see the threads are there for every1 to read and bad-wannabe-good players are allways eager to take advantage of flaws. The funny thing is, how couldnt u beat terif with this surprise???? thats beyond my understanding, terif is great, but if i was to do that move terif is dead before 1 year thast for sure. maybe u were so excited, kiddo-like , or maybe u r a low-average player trying to be big. Next subject, the terif-clones, as u call me. I always admit i am using terif moves, geeze, ive been playing him about 20 games or so, He has developed the BEST tactics for taking minors, man, this guy has studied the game, they are PERFECT!, of course im using it, some of them, sometimes. I can recognize a good thing when i see one. U obviously cant. I was LMAO when i read about yer strategy with italy and the 11 airfleets over france, poor-average player move? yep, i think so. SPAIN YEah, i hate that spain is so easyly conquered, i already have posted about it sometimes. Spain would never fall like this, unrealistic. But im waiting for SC2, some very good ideas have been exposed in this forum about it and may hubert listen to them. Funny thing u claim about 'all the way the north africa supply route to iraq', the way u play: all-or-nothing with the LC gambit, this has nothing to do with it, u r always losing games in the very first year,( the longer the game the more chances see u r a poor-average-player? ), as i told u once, terif was right i told u, i tried once to beat terif with the 1-turn-LC gambit to no avail. Well, no more to say. I laughed at yer posts, pricky but very funny, now i laugh at yer game. SHAME.