Jump to content

Formerly Babra

Members
  • Posts

    938
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Formerly Babra

  1. I'm pretty saavy on kangaroos, but I'm still looking for info on the elusive "Stuart Kangaroo". Anyone have Hunnicut's "Stuart" to check this out for me? I have serious doubts about the existence of this vehicle and/or its usage. AFAIK, the Priest and Ram varieties were the only kangaroos to see action.

    I could be wrong, and if I am I wanna know about it.

    ------------------

    It's a mother-beautiful bridge and it's gonna be THERE.

  2. If shrapnel is flying all around, I want my helmet where it belongs -- on my noggin. If I don't want to expose my bits, I just go in the bottom of the foxhole. Standin' in it has gotta be better'n wearin' it on your head.

    ------------------

    It's a mother-beautiful bridge and it's gonna be THERE.

  3. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by mensch:

    ...nothing like hearing a Newfoundlander screaming at the top of his lungs, telling his lads to move thier butts<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Hehehe... "G'wan, B'ys! Where'd dem PIATs go, eh? I turn'd 'round an' dere dey were, side by each, GAN!"

    ------------------

    It's a mother-beautiful bridge and it's gonna be THERE.

  4. Just to throw things back a bit, I think most folks missed my reference to the comparison between casualties at Waterloo (1 day) and Gettysburg (3 days). The casualties were approximately equal, with approximately equal forces engaged. The short answer to this quizical factoid is that, despite the greater accuracy, killing power and loading times of the rifled musket with minie ball, tactics had CHANGED between 1815 and 1863.

    ------------------

    It's a mother-beautiful bridge and it's gonna be THERE.

  5. I'm sure deadline will be back. It's only been a couple of days. I was only joking about scaring him off.

    I wouldn't say I'm winning either, but I did have fun with that PIAT team. KO'd an armoured car, side penetration on a Tiger (damage unknown), track hit on another Tiger (no damage). Expended all his rounds (no mean feat! Have you seen how long it takes to reload them things???) and slipped away back to his lines without ever once coming under fire. Too sweet.

    ------------------

    It's a mother-beautiful bridge and it's gonna be THERE.

  6. Guachi - that's "Harper's History of the Civil War" (a centennial reprint), Conway's "All The World's Fighting Ships", and of course Hunnicut's "Sherman".

    You are quite right, there are at least a dozen more strewn around, but they're all over (and under) the chesterfield, where I do most of my reading. Ah, the good life. Think I'll have a beer... wink.gif

    ------------------

    It's a mother-beautiful bridge and it's gonna be THERE.

  7. He doesn't love me any more either, Pat. <sniff>. I think he's still upset about my lone, unsupported PIAT team lurking through the village molesting his armoured cars and big cats without ever being spotted... smile.gif

    Maybe we can start a jilted players club, eh?

    ------------------

    It's a mother-beautiful bridge and it's gonna be THERE.

  8. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by paullus:

    It was not until the development of the tank, and tactics on its use (WWII & the panzers) that offensive power once again was on top.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    I would say it was the advent of Stosstruppen infantry tactics (infiltrate past main points of resistance and launch schwerepunkt at weaker sectors) which negated static defences. All the advent of armour achieved was to make exploitation faster, deeper, and thus have more strategic consequences. It also gave a new name to the tactics developed in 1917 - Blitzkrieg.

    ------------------

    It's a mother-beautiful bridge and it's gonna be THERE.

  9. <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by IntelWeenie:

    IIRC, the Soviets made some special AT hand grenades (I can't for sure remember if they made it into WWII), including a couple models with a cute litte parachute to make sure the shaped charge was pointing the right way... Can anyone confirm WWII usage of these? If so, will they be included in CM2?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Here's an extract from the Panzerfaust website on the Panzerwurfmine, which fits the description of the item you're talking about. I don't know if the Russians had anything comparable.

    <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Because of the problems to stabilize the dedicated anti-tank grenades for flight - the shaped charge needed to be pointed straight at the armor to work efficiently - the Panzerwurfmine ("tank throw mine") or PWM (L) (L for "lang" = "long") was developed by the Luftwaffe weapon's bureau (the Luftwaffe also contained ground forces in the form of it's field units and the paratroopers).

    The weapon weighed 1.36kg, had a length of 53.3cm and used a stabilizing assembly of four fins made of canvas at it's rear. It was introduced into service in May of 1943 but proved rather impractical. Still, 203,800 were produced in 1943.

    It's successor model was the Panzerwurfmine Kz (Kz = kurz ("short")) that weighed only 1 kg. Flight stabilization now was achieved by a long canvas strip that rolled out when the weapon was thrown and extended from it's rear. The warhead had a diameter of 11.4 cm and carried a shaped charge of 500g that had an armor penetration of 150mm.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    ------------------

    It's a mother-beautiful bridge and it's gonna be THERE.

×
×
  • Create New...