Sgt Joch Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 on RPG accuracy, don't forget that when you go up against Syrian regular forces, that the game assumes that they have had basic military training and they know how to operate their weapons. A direct comparaison with the experience in Iraq is misleading. Most insurgents had no military training and did not know how to properly operate the weapon. You had many instances where users would forget to arm the round before loading it so that it would not detonate on impact. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meade95 Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 on RPG accuracy, don't forget that when you go up against Syrian regular forces, that the game assumes that they have had basic military training and they know how to operate their weapons. A direct comparaison with the experience in Iraq is misleading. Most insurgents had no military training and did not know how to properly operate the weapon. You had many instances where users would forget to arm the round before loading it so that it would not detonate on impact. This notion was perhaps accurate in 03/04.....but was not the case at all by late 05/06/07... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt Joch Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 I found this on RPG hit probabilities, apparently from a 1975 U.S. Army test: Hit probabilities A US Army evaluation of the weapon gave the hit probabilities on a 5 meter wide (15 feet), 2.5 meter tall (7.5 feet) panel moving sideways at 4 meters per second (9 miles per hour).[5] Range........Percent 50 m...........100% 100 m..........96 % 200 m..........51 % 300 m..........22 % 400 m...........9 % 500 m...........4 % I presume the shooter was a soldier with military experience. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPG-7 I don't know if anyone has data which is more recent or on point, but it seems consistent with what we see in game. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3k Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 I'd love to see the same hit probabilities based on the same target/same projectile vs. a stationary target. Ken 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingknives Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 The table in David Isby's 1988 "Weapons and Tactics of the Soviet Union" cites: Exposed, Stationary, ----------1st round-- 2nd round 50m...........98%........98% 100m..........91%.......95% 200m..........52%.......78% 300m..........27%.......56% 400m..........10%.......38% 500m............5%.......25% 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hcrof Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Ha - flamingknives was too fast for me! I would be interested to know how the increased weight of the newer warheads affects accuracy and range of the weapon. That 105mm tandem warhead is almost double the weight of the 85/93mm warheads. Do they use different sights? Do they upgrade the sustainer motor? I suspect most of the relevant information is in Russian however. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3k Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 Interesting... Thanks for posting Isby's information. I don't know if the size of Isby's target is the same as the size of the Wikipedia target, but the salient point gathered from comparing the two tables is that the target's motion status does not significantly alter the odds of a hit. Ken 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamingknives Posted May 18, 2010 Share Posted May 18, 2010 The target is an M60A3 tank at 30 degrees to the firer and an 11km/h cross-wind. Furthermore, Isby quotes: Exposed, moving, 2nd round only (1st is assumed to have a very low phit except at 100m or less, based on the supporting text) 50m..........97% 100m........90% 200m........55% 300m........27% 400m........16% 500m........6% 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveDash Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Also I guess Syria has hordes of RPG-29's which are from my understanding extremely effective. Not all the RPG's being fired at us are RPG-7's. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt Joch Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Syria has RPG 29 and they are in game, but I have not seen numbers on the Syrian inventory in RL. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryujin Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 Ha - flamingknives was too fast for me! I would be interested to know how the increased weight of the newer warheads affects accuracy and range of the weapon. That 105mm tandem warhead is almost double the weight of the 85/93mm warheads. Do they use different sights? Do they upgrade the sustainer motor? I suspect most of the relevant information is in Russian however. Yes, they have a very steep ballistic arc, the motor is pretty much the same AFAIK. Best for short range attacks. I believe the effective range is considered to be 200m (as opposed to around 500m for the single warhead rounds). The RPG-29 fires pretty much the same warhead, but with a different motor for a longer effective range. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.