arado234 Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 Is it better to have it on or off if you want the major powers building capacity at historical? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisND Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 I prefer it on myself. More options for the players, and besides without it the US is limited to a tiny army. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The K Man Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 What is the norm for human vs human game?. Is the soft build on or off. I have always had it off to make it more interesting. I'm thinking now in Version 1.05a, the advantage (if off) would be slightly on the allied side. (As previously stated - gives the UK & US more Armies.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I kind of noticed something, as the UK you may build them all, though rarely the armies come first. The Corps and Air would be more cost effective... As the USA, yes the Armies would be nice if you could find a front to place them. Otherwise unlimited units = German Production increase into an Unstoppable horde. So it favors Axis Originally posted by The K Man: What is the norm for human vs human game?. Is the soft build on or off. I have always had it off to make it more interesting. I'm thinking now in Version 1.05a, the advantage (if off) would be slightly on the allied side. (As previously stated - gives the UK & US more Armies.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arado234 Posted January 7, 2007 Author Share Posted January 7, 2007 So if the soft build limit is on you can keep building,correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts