Jump to content

Anti-Tank Rifles vs. Tank Tracks


Recommended Posts

In a very informative discussion on these boards some months ago, some people claimed that the skirts was added to protect the tanks from ATRs penetrating the hull and turret sides, not the tracks. I remember them having pretty convincing sources as well as only the tanks with sides vulnerable to ATRs were given skirts, Tigers that had thick sides were not given skirts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lower hull sides tend to be very thin on most tanks, especially those types whos service predates WW2 - just loo kat hte figures for Pz3 and -4's.

As for tracks - so you put a 8mm or 15mm hole in a track or a wheel - what do you expect to happen then?

It's not like there's crew to be hit by splinters, or that such a hole is likely to cause complete failure of that track or wheel!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In ex-Desert Rat C.S.Joly's book "Take These Men",he mentions the time some disgruntled 1942 Brit tankers aired their disquiet to a senior officer about how their armour wasn't capable of stopping German AP-shot,to which he gave the assurance "Cheer up men,better tanks are on the way,and remember not all shots hit head-on,and will glance off if the angle is narrow,just as they'd bounce off water"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...