Dragonheart Posted April 14, 2003 Share Posted April 14, 2003 Do you grant the attacker in a QB additional points? The preset ratio is 1,5:1 What´s a fair ratio in your opinion? Is it also a matter of time period and map-features? Sorry for bothering but i couldn´t find anything about that in the forum. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwolf Posted April 14, 2003 Share Posted April 14, 2003 Force ratio alone cannotmake for a fair QB. You need some armor limiting rules like the old Fionn rules, otherwise KV-1s, StuGs and Tigers may ruin the experience. Bigger Quickbattles have far too wide and not deep enough maps. But generally I found that a 1.65 (10% advantage) is more fair than 1.5. But that was with CMBB 1.00, some changes might have affected the "optimal" ratio. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanir Ausf B Posted April 14, 2003 Share Posted April 14, 2003 Something you may want to try is setting game type to 'assault' instead of 'attack'. This gives the attacker a 1.72:1 ratio, but also moves the flags further back towards the map edge, mitigating another problem with QB maps (lack of depth). Game dates that are fairly even are: June '42 June '44 February '45 These dates assume rarity is being used. When selecting weather, keep in mind that poor ground conditions favor the defender. Let the Germans use mechanized division type, or alternatively, use unrestricted force. [ April 14, 2003, 03:38 PM: Message edited by: Vanir Ausf B ] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.