Cauldron Posted September 20, 2001 Share Posted September 20, 2001 Well although i think i rememebr who won WW 2 , I'm STILL sure I read 80 %$ of the books. Only 30 000 books. Yea read those last year. :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
von shrad Posted September 20, 2001 Share Posted September 20, 2001 Well good thing you started another thread instead of posting to the horrible one already started. If you reply to this, try to keep it in the same thread for everyone else sake instead of atarting yet another. BTW, I don't think anyone was ammused. *sigh* von shrad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Fox Posted September 20, 2001 Share Posted September 20, 2001 Don't worry Cauldron, it wasn't what you posted that amused me the most. Unfortunately no one bothered to answer your question. Which is a perfectly reasonable one which has puzzled me somewhat too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParaBellum Posted September 20, 2001 Share Posted September 20, 2001 AT LEAST HE DOESN'T YELL AT US ALL THE TIME WHENEVER HE POSTS SOMEFINK LIKE SOME OTHER PEOPLE ON THIS FORUM!!!! Ooops, sorry... P.S. Amused? Not really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PJungnitsch Posted September 20, 2001 Share Posted September 20, 2001 We had a big discussion on the Puppchen a while ago. Ian Hogg states in 'Tank Killers' that the Puppchen was a more complex version of the Panzershreck, fitted with a combination cartridge/rocket firing system that gave more range and mounted on a light wheeled carriage that gave more accuracy, but that there were problems with the perfection of it. The other view I remember was that it was an early attempt at a bazooka-type weapon, and when the Germans captured some bazookas and tested them they realized that the shoulder-fired design was plenty good enough and switched production to the Panzershrek. Either way there wasn't a whole lot of them made. The reasons the KV's didn't have more impact than they did had more to do with lack of numbers, maintenance, repair and crew training than anything else. Some of them did give the Germans fits but there was simply not enough to make a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Beazley MP Ma Posted September 20, 2001 Share Posted September 20, 2001 <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Simon Fox: Don't worry Cauldron, it wasn't what you posted that amused me the most. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Very true... Simon, send me some email! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vergeltungswaffe Posted September 20, 2001 Share Posted September 20, 2001 God help me I don't want to sound like Max, but I think meeting Panzerman, Fieldmarschall and Cauldron would go something like this, "Hi,........I'm Rob and this is my brother Daryl,....and my other brother Daryl." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pascal DI FOLCO Posted September 20, 2001 Share Posted September 20, 2001 Ok, Cauldron, welcome to the most sarcatisc and mean bunch of grogs aver the world !! I suppose you passed the test, although if Fionn still have been here... Well, about KV the Germans had thrills but managed getting them by immobilization, rear shots, etc... as they did in '40 with the heavy French tanks B-1Bis - and as MG-man stated there was not much of'em, and they had logistcial problems, command problems, maintenance problems... BTW who won the war ? The USA or the Soviets ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vskalex Posted September 20, 2001 Share Posted September 20, 2001 <BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Pascal DI FOLCO: BTW who won the war ? The USA or the Soviets ?? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> War between Soviet and USA? And the world is still standing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts