chuckdyke Posted December 26, 2020 Share Posted December 26, 2020 Nine Turns, stuck to the basic principles and I don't regard myself as an expert on Armoured Warfare. Actually, a little disappointed with this scenario. Wish everybody a happy 2021. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjkerner Posted December 26, 2020 Share Posted December 26, 2020 Did you play solo? I ask because that’s a head to head scenario and I don’t think those have AI plans. Happy New Year to you too! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THH149 Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 8 hours ago, mjkerner said: that’s a head to head scenario and I don’t think those have AI plans. They most certainly do! I'd say the reverse, the H2H labelled scenarios are very lopsided (in the sense that both sides dont have an even chance at achieving the scenario victory conditions, even if one side gets smashed in units killed). See UK H2H British Armour Mix vs Syrian Armour mix, for instance which is heavily biased in favour of the Brits vis the victory conditions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chuckdyke Posted December 28, 2020 Author Share Posted December 28, 2020 On 12/27/2020 at 12:49 AM, mjkerner said: Did you play solo? I ask because that’s a head to head scenario and I don’t think those have AI plans. Happy New Year to you too! According to the battle you could play against the AI. I had nothing to do so I selected a 30-turn battle. I don't like Armor only. With meeting engagements, you get some good intelligence. You know the objective of the enemy; it is child's play to determine where you will destroy the enemy. No need to take your objective when he surrenders. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.