zinzan Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Possibly a dumb question BUT, Is it normal for a Occupy Objective victory location to disappear when you locate it? Message received was that "Troops have located 'objective x' " ; the mission briefing states occupy. I thought you had to be "holding" it when the scenario ended to count as occupying? Does this mean I will get the points even if I move my troops away? When I say disappear i mean the green background to the location, which outlines the objective AS's - 1 problem i have is that it was a large objective and I can't figure out where the edges of it were. btw I have checked and objectives are STILL turned on (several others still visible) Thanks for the help in advance and please feel free to abuse me or yell RTFM if necessary Zinzan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Wenman Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 That was a touch objective which you only have to touch once to achieve. Occupy objectives don't provide a message text and the objective remains visible throughout. P 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zinzan Posted June 11, 2015 Author Share Posted June 11, 2015 Hmmm that was my assumption - The scenario briefing definetely lists it as an ocupy objective. Would it be "gamey" to adjust my plans now as my opponent will be assumming I am going to garrison this location? (btw this is a HtH game with a scenario.) OTOH it does give me a chance to recover from a major cock-up in deplyment I will report this (after the game) in my feedback obviously. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Wenman Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) It could just be the briefing is wrong, or it could be a freebie - what scenario is it ? Is the objective known to both sides as if not your opponent won't know about it regardless of whether it is a touch or occupy objective P Edited June 11, 2015 by Pete Wenman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zinzan Posted June 12, 2015 Author Share Posted June 12, 2015 (edited) "Drive on the Dreijenseweg" CMMG Dunno whether my opponent knows the allied objectives; and I don't want to open the scenario as it may give me an unfair advantage. I've decided to treat this as a designed error i.e. You have received updated intelligence/orders. I'll discuss it with my opponent after the game is finished. Many Thanks for your replies. Edited June 12, 2015 by zinzan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Wenman Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 Well that's interesting because that's one of mine. The intent here ( I think, as it was a while ago) was to give the Allied player some flexibility as to occupy all the objectives would be very difficult. I won't say any more as you are still playing but we can pick this up when you finish if you like. But you are correct the error is deliberate. P 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warts 'n' all Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 What a coincidence! I'm a 2.12 er, and am slowly working my way chronologically through all the battles. I should be taking this on in a week or two. The map looks great Pete. I'll check this thread again after the AI has given me a good kicking. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zinzan Posted June 12, 2015 Author Share Posted June 12, 2015 Thanks Pete Wenman, I will give you some feedback (if wanted) when we finish; so far it's very "interesting" - in a nail biting - "OH GAWD WE'RE ALL GOING to DIE" way Just a comment - I really like the idea of "misleading/flexible" briefings/objectives as this better reflects the reality of combat. Anyway back to the game 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.