Jump to content

Vacillator

Members
  • Posts

    3,514
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Vacillator

  1. 2 hours ago, Artkin said:

    So Nvidia forces its customers to upload screenshots they took (Essentially without their permission) and then has limits on the storage space you can use?

    LMAOOOOO **** Nvidia. These guys are smoking crack. Why should Nvidia have my screenshots? They are mine. They belong on my hard drive. Nvidia isn't reinventing the wheel with screenshot software. I sincerely hope they go out of business.

    Ermmm, no, that's not what I meant.  They don't force me to upload screenshots, why would they?  I use it because it works and doesn't give me the loading screen every time like pressing the Windows PrintScreen button does.

    And the limit I referred to is on the forum here, nothing to do with Nvidia.  I can only post 1.95MB of pictures, after which I must delete old ones to make space.  And the old pictures then seem to disappear from the threads.

  2. 1 hour ago, benpark said:

    I expect that impacts all titles if not working as intended. I don't expect that has been changed since the advent of CMx2

    I believe this is correct, or at least PrintScreen has alway given me the loading screen instead of in-game shots in the WW2 titles.

    To get around it, I use Nvidia's graphics software to capture, Alt-F1 seems to do it. 

    Sadly I can only post a few pics anyway before my allowance is gone, and often deleting previous ones in my profile 'store' removes them from whatever thread they were in.  I've seen suggestions that remote hosting (Imgur or whatever) is a better soultion but haven't bothered yet...

  3. 2 hours ago, kohlenklau said:

    I put all the turret numeral layers in a layer group and set the group to soft light layer mode. Down at the bottom right is my prototype of a DAK M41 feld mutze.

     

    wa79879.png

    Great job Phil, but on a minor note I think perhaps the 8's are upside down (i.e. the larger circles should be at the bottom)? Please don't shoot the messenger 🙏.

  4. Assume you've checked all the usual blunder-possibilities?  Like putting the file in the right game but wrong folder, or in the wrong game but right folder etc. etc.?  Is the name of the file actually new?  Does it show up if you change it to another name?  Are the preceding saves also 60MB as this would suggest size is not the problem?

    I'm sure you have you my friend so sorry if I'm stating the obvious 😉.

  5. 13 minutes ago, Warts 'n' all said:

    It's terrible. The electronic dirge is enough to put anyone with ears off for a start. And what the hell are Russian language street signs doing on this map? BFC need to fix that pretty damn sharpish.

    I like a bit of electronic dirge.  If only I could find my ears I'm sure it would sound even better...

  6. On 6/19/2021 at 3:09 PM, zaybz said:

    I’m a relatively new player looking for suggestions as to which Campaign to play next

    Does it have to be a campaign?  There are some excellent standalone scenarios - for example anything by @George MC

    If it does have to be a campaign, I have had great fun (and pain) from Final Blitzkrieg campaigns, and also from an unexpected source which was @kohlenklau's Fortress Italy 'Wacht am Rapido' made I believe some time before FB came out.

    Thinking about all of these, they all have great '3 dimensional' maps and the need to use or cope with elevation changes on CM maps is one of my favourite things about the game.

  7. On 6/20/2021 at 1:12 PM, StieliAlpha said:

    @kohlenklau just started a project to create early war scenarios. IIRC, he plans to base it on CMFI. Anyway, search for his thread or contact Kohl for info.

    Yes indeed, having just played one of his scenarios  set near the Corinth Canal in Greece I can say that the idea has great potential. Needs some careful selection of forces of course.  If anyone can do it @kohlenklau can 👍.

    7 hours ago, Chibot Mk IX said:

    today is 80 years anniversary of Barbarossa

    I mentioned this to my better half yesterday, to which I received the expected response - "what are you going on about now?".  Oh well, history is not for everyone 🙄😁.

  8. 15 minutes ago, womble said:

    By "right", do you mean "an accurate simulation", then no, obviously it's not. Steel plate is steel plate and takes energy out of whatever penetrates it. But I'd imagine that the designers considered the number of times that it may occur where a penetrating hit can go on to strike another target low enough to not burden the codebase with very-rarely-used calculations.

    And I would accept that.  It seems however that the OP and his opponent are finding the exception to the rule in their game.

  9. 3 minutes ago, womble said:

    the outbound armour skin isn't counted

    I for one have never really considered this, but I think observation backs it up and I would not doubt your word. 

    Is it right that it is so?  On a HT or even a Panzer IV perhaps it makes little difference but what if I penetrate the rear of let's say a Tiger and it goes straight out the front with no slowing, no deflection etc.?  Of course I fully realise it's not about to change, and given that I hadn't considered or even appreciate fully why it is so, I won't be losing any sleep over it 😉.

  10. 2 hours ago, Warts 'n' all said:

    I can't imagine there being anyone, brave, or foolish enough to hang the flags out every morning in late April 45.

    If that's the date, you make a fair point.  They might have just left them out all the time though?  I don't fly a flag from my parapets so I wouldn't know whether etiquette dictates nightly furling.

×
×
  • Create New...