Not beng facetious, but deploying a Patriot battery south and away from defending cities would not be a solo event, right? It would be a strategic decision and part of a much bigger shift in operations. Preceded by smaller related and varied ops and enabling much larger ones once in place? Like, say, the quiet, staged deployment of F16s?
Doesnt that fit the observed pace, pattern and results table of the UKR operations along Black Sea Coast and Kherson in AO?
Pushing the patriots south is not just shifting an AD capability - it implies leaving somewhere else undefended, so doing so must be worth it.
Defending a critical national-level economic asset would fit that bill nicely. A blocked sea-borne grain export is a state viability disaster.
So the creation and protection of a viable grain corridor is arguably Ukraine's greatest strategic victory of 2024.
It guarantees a serious portion of state income, improves geopolitical credibility and signals theatre level military capability. Russia tried to prevent it and failed completely. Ukraine won the economic breathing space to live another year.
This idea suggests that Crimea/Kerch bridge has been a red herring all year, in a way. The southern AA/AD campaign, multi domain and all, has really just been about one thing: "the economy, stupid."
It helps explain the low use of scalps etc, ie husbanding them in case of a determined Russian push against the grain corridor.
Next year, I suspect, will be really about the relentless murder of the Russian BSF and isolation of Crimea.