Jump to content

kevinkin

Members
  • Posts

    3,208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by kevinkin

  1. Enemy at the Gate was my perhaps first military history book purchased as a tiny paperback during the summer around 1973. The author was interviewed on US Public TV which I began watching earlier for their coverage of Fischer Spassky. It was that interview, and the song "Roads to Moscow" released about the same time, that got me started on east front WWII.

    Kevin

    PS So, funny as it may seem, "Enemy" was on my summer reading list 42 years ago!

  2. Modeling human behavior under fire has no simple solution. Who is to say what a green troop will do if taking fire from front and flank. Maybe they will just hide in place and not run away / rout at all. Poor quality troops should tend more for self preservation with less concern about their comrades and the mission. Even in a small unit like a platoon the response to fire will be individual. If the player retains control of their troops receiving fire they decide if a tactical withdrawal make sense. Once they lose control, the TAC AI has to model what is the best course of action - hide in place, run for the hills. Perhaps a "retreat" command that takes the unit off map using a faster or most concealed route? With AI plans, the map exit makes sense. A new waypoint would need be to be developed. How to score off map retreats should not be too hard.

    Kevin

  3. Hi .. I went to click the download and then stopped and asked "what is this network thing and how does it related to the BFC in game multiplayer?" I search and see it allows people (n=30?) to "network" and play "games". I wonder why this is the first I heard of it. It sounds interesting. I am not the paranoid type - did banking via a modem - but need more info before I d/l and check it out.

    Kevin

  4. I am about to take a plunge into the books below. Any thoughts? What are you guys reading?

    Anything new from the Soviet perspective?

    Kevin

    Hitler's Army: The Evolution and Structure of German Forces

    Tank Warfare on the Eastern Front 1941-1942: Schwerpunkt

    Where the Iron Crosses Grow: The Crimea 1941-44

    Ghost Fleet (modern novel)

  5. That was my initial thinking - that the Soviets would not equip the formations greatly given their offensive doctrine. But mortars became such a major component of their infantry tactics perhaps maybe they had a little more protection. I guess like all soldiers they would pick up anything that did not slow their movement down so a LMG per company may be reasonable.

    Kevin

  6. Were these units able to defend themselves with anything other than their personal rifles and side arms?

    I have read mortar companies deployed scouts to select firing positions and OPs. So I imagine they would

    be available to ward off enemy infiltrations. Were any MGs assigned for local defense? Not sure if the answer lies in the official TOE. I am interested in the 82 mm formations mid to late war in particular.

    Thanks ...

    Kevin

×
×
  • Create New...