ERISS

What are the tools to help setting the troops in the field? The bigger flaw of CM1s was there was only a line, and not a colouring of the map (as in Steel Panthers). That's why I found it very boring to play defensive, as you must conceal the troops and you can't see quickly all where they are seen from.

The problem is too many players don't care about DRMs nor monopolies. As the Steam lovers don't want to buy non-Steam games, the independant games have to go to Steam and become dependant from Steam.

I launched one in the woods: The 'nade bounced on a tree and landed on the helmet of a mate 5 meters in front of me in a foxhole lol He went angry, but he should have been happy I didn't pull the pin out!

Before the Abraham, Israel tank was the 1st "real one". American Army must be the 1st killer of abrahams, as they destroyed immobilized ones they couldn't repair on the battlefields...

Nope. He said he was surprised it could be so spectacular. So, as he had tried years before 9/11 to blow the towers, you think he said "yes it's me", but he didn't. Either, he didn't say no, for US were advertising for Al Qaeda (prestige for his anti-america recruitment). He was, but not for 9/11 attacks. That's your legal link, but it's not enough to be an evidence. Knowing who really is the offender. Innocence presumption. There were many evidences that the japanese were the attackers of Pearl Harbour. They had been clearly identified. I try not to defend Ben Laden, but truth is the best for justice and peace.

Are you sure Ben Laden is legaly wanted for blowing up towers in 2001? He is not, he was not legaly wanted when United Nations agreed the war. Afghanistan is the same fake cause as Irak. If USA (and U.N.!) don't care about the laws, killing without evidence, why would USA craft a democracy in Afghanistan??

USA has hugely helped the Talibans, instead of Massoud, against the USSR (Europa also nor did help Massoud). Then USA, without evidence, invade Afghanistan (why United Nations followed the US???). Why an afghan would like the talibans the US has put to power, why an afghan would like the US invading them after that? This war is not the afghan people one, they will let talibans and americans die (and helping them die if they don't go away).

Not your fault, as the ad was cheaty. I'm happy I didn't buy the bundle (I nearly did it).

Ok. But, as we still need some cd to write the downloaded install program, I like having an 'official' box. So; I tend buying game dvd boxes in small shops. And I prefer having a localised game. I don't think e-games are.

I don't like DRMs as without internet we could no longer play. So, why can't we have both protections on a game? Cost?: I will be ok for a DRM if it's a nocd AND we still can play using the CD if we can't/don't want to use internet. So, when will there be a patch for CM:SF adding a nocd? (drm or not)

Maybe Battlefront does not like DRM, and they will gain less money through Steam, and that will be an other problem for the patches (there are already 3 different ones for now).

Not very smart, but I smiled. Hey you forgot la bread baguette!

Yup, that's working. Good patch. Drivers are no longer drunk.

That's why squads have not to hide: They must search actively: see and fire first, as soon the RPG is pointing at the windows, else forbiddening to fire a second time. I think personal aiming technology is very important here.

(Edit to my post above: . Squads on the roof: One aiming at 12, the other at 10, . Send one of your middle Striker protect left flank.) My "only one injured" was with patch 1.6, maybe that's harder now.