Jump to content

mogg

Members
  • Posts

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

mogg's Achievements

Junior Member

Junior Member (1/3)

0

Reputation

  1. i waited for the 1.02 patch.. well it's always sloooow for the poor it shows on a X4600+ & X1900XT (even without shadows) and it crash too much to be enjoyable maybe in 6 months or even next year.. hope combat mission 4 (ww2) will be better very disapointed
  2. will ID be ID like today if they didn't support modding for Doom and DoomII? I think CM could support at least adding new units. and for cheating you could simply choose between original CM and modded CM at your own risk. i understand BF don't want to allow modding. it's a little old fashion way to make videogames but maybe you would give a try on an old product? maybe when CMx2 WW2 will be released you could add support to just add units (3D, art, sounds and spec) to see how the comunity modding will change the old CM and maybe raise the sells? and arguments about tons of mods around and dead links. it's true but you don't have to install mods. if you don't want you just don't do it
  3. +1 exactelly but i have ATI X1900XT amd X2 4600+ on xp32 sp2 no norton (never! ) but nod32
  4. i thought it was normal for me to have slow fps because CM are not very high end fast graphics but seems to be problems because i have a X1900XT abd a 4600+ dual core and even with shadows off (which are ugly anyway) and it's 10fps in 1800x1024. so i'm gonna check the tech forum right now
  5. good news! maybe i'll finally buy this game... i'm waiting for the patches
  6. funy when you think some telling that the problems about the complains are not the problem in the game but the ones who complain this game is not perfect, this game is not wargame, it could be a great game but it's "only" an ok game which will be forget soon if anything is not made with patches or mods. the fact that i come here and i don't like this game is that this game COULD be GREAT and i think lot of people are here for that too. such a mess we're waiting for years a descent wargame with a descent 3D engine since CC and CM and have instead over and over RTS
  7. in the demo i saw too inf entering a small farm only by the entrance : / maybe you have to crush the fence with a tank first?
  8. i don't like ToW neither ok it's nice but it looks too much unfinished too me. maybe it's because we're used to CM and it's quite the ultimate wargame except for 3D view and i think we all are waiting this! an ultimate sim engine with a good damn 3D engine! but ToW right now is like a Afrika Korps Vs Desert Rats with only longer LOS in a way
  9. i have 2GB i think it's the cpu because at the beginning it was great (with all options to max) but the more russian units come, the more it lag even if i put option to middle/low a cpu bottleneck in the sim engine maybe
  10. this demo is very useful to show how the game seems not finished and wrong. how sad. this even not a close combat level.. i just tried the first mission and it's so slow on my 4600+ that i bored a lot i think there are too many units and too much sims effect (unlike rts) to be handled by a common cpu... well, the games seems to be wrong in the design for me : / i will not by it
  11. +1 :/ more i try the demo and more i think that's the game is wrong i hate games when you have to fight against your own troops just to stop them idiot kamikaze charges [ April 23, 2007, 11:26 PM: Message edited by: mogg ]
×
×
  • Create New...