Jump to content

Denwad

Members
  • Posts

    356
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Denwad

  1. Originally posted by Sergei:

    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by flamingknives:

    If you were firing at maximum rate, would you notice that the tube had been hit?

    If bullets were flying that close to you, I think you would not only notice it, you'd also pick up your assault rifle and defend yourself. </font>
  2. Half-tracks do have their merits, they will tow the heaviest of guns up hills to watch over flags

    in a recent QB (lots of points i think 2.5k) as the russians, I bought some Malaxa MG carriers to tow three ZIS-3s up a hill, low and behold my opponent had purchased a platoon of Panthers, and two Ferdinands. Naturally he didn't have much infantry, but I didn't have much either because I had bought three platoons of T-34/85s, an OT-34 and two SU-76s ( and two sweet ass Il-2s )

    big forest in the middle next to a town in a depression, perfect ambush country, if i get there first. The flag is in a rather anemic forest and my infantry close and occupy the forest just seconds before his infantry ( as I recall we both had a company of infantry, he had Jägers and I had Gaurds ) which erupted in an enormous back-and-forth gun battle which resulted in my victory ( game turned out to be a draw, I lost -all- of my armor )

    My OT-34 ambushes one Panther before being taken out by another, the Panthers begin to rush the town in a desperate last push to kill my armor, which works :mad:

    but my dedicated carriers had moved my guns up a rather spiry rough-covered peak that overlooked the town, which is where the Panthers were at.

    Two panthers down by 250m side-shots, the other two by the IL-2s

    My MG carriers also came to the rescue in the woods when my opponent pushed a platoon of Jägers around my weakly defended flank, they repulsed the attack and I fought the bloody battle to a draw thanks to my beautiful Malaxas

  3. i think some of you are generalizing waaaaay too much, different tanks and nations had different ways of sighting etc.

    for example

    the bow MG on a Panzer III had a telescopic sight

    the bow MG on a Stuart V didn't have a sight at all, the gunner was to aim with the tracers

    the bow MG on a T-34 was aimed by iron sights through a small hole in the armored shield of the gun

    example 2

    a vehicle mounted .50 is on a unstable pintle mount ( although some [maybe even most] mounts did include the fine adjustment gear, it would be my guess that to make them fire and acquire targets as quickly as they do in CM this fine adjustment gear was disconnected to facilitate mobility of the gun mount )

    a tripod infantry .50 is on a fully adjustable tripod that allows for minute changes in elevation etc.

    example 3

    the half track mounted MG-42 is also on an unstable pintle mount

    the infantry sMG-42 has a VERY stable tripod that includes recoil-absorbing features to further stablize the mount

    [ October 18, 2005, 12:16 PM: Message edited by: Denwad ]

×
×
  • Create New...