[can i play me friend over internet using tungle]

Does anyone use this method, is it easy to set up

I use tunngle (2 n) and yes it is very easy. Install and play, there is also a network named: "Combat Mission shock Force".

["The Farm" Tournament - OFFICIAL SIGN-UP]

I hope you would reconsider. Certainly the tournament is not irretrievably damaged beyond the first turn. There are 31 other well behaved players who I think would love to continue.

+1 I hope you would reconsider.

[The farm tournament: another exercise in frustration]

Are you really so stupid that you don't realize your giving enormous spoilers to an IN PROGRESS tournament with 31 other players?

perfectly just!

Some administrators may delete this thread.....

Or MOS edit and delete, again Java delete your quote.

I have already finish this round, so no spoiler for me.

[Multiplay problem]

Whenever my friend and I try to play a head to head game, 2 player internet/lan Quick Battle, we connect fine. By the time we get our forces picked and start, the game says your opponent has left the battlefield or something like that. Any help is appreciated.

I think it can be a problem of open port.

you use some program? (hamachi or tungle..... p2p)

["The Farm" Tournament - OFFICIAL SIGN-UP]

and now third bracket :eek: (I am already in )

But how beautiful are the scenarios made ​​by Bimmer!

I still remember the scenario for CMSF "The Race is On", a true example of Bimmer's philosophy.

Thanks Bimmer.

["The Farm" Tournament - OFFICIAL SIGN-UP]

ilbaronefutama (@) gmail (dot) com

Not a real problem and a big difference, but consider the

chance to play iron level

[Any interest in a small tournament?]

Sign me, but only if you do not play mirrors.

[Commonwealth before Christmas? Any hope?]

Before. :eek:

[CMBN PBEM tournament on worldatwar, need 3-4 players]

One more player.

Sorry for the up.

[CMBN PBEM tournament on worldatwar, need 3-4 players]

Features of the tournament:

PBEM; Single Elimination; Mirrored games; QB based maps with specific settings; 16 players in the starting for 4 rounds.

About 1 file for day. There will be a draconian deadline (Write your curriculum)

http://worldatwar.eu/index.php?〈=3&refcode=0&location=boardshownode&boardid=2784'>The tournament is going to start on 15th of September.

http://worldatwar.eu/index.php?〈=3&refcode=0&location=boardshownode&boardid=2755

[Found quite the annoying bug...]

I have already reported the problem.

http://www.battlefront.com/community/showthread.php?t=100188

I think it is obvious and therefore there is nothing to say.

I hope in the next patch will be placed, with news for multiplayer online (pause, save options and lobby :confused:)

[CMBN games seem to be more imbalanced...]

I disagree. I think 80 games is a decent number of games to look at and say "gee, that's interesting".

For heaven's sake, people complain about the balance of a scenario they played after _one_ playing. They are happy to look at graphs like this:

http:///gregories.net/bobster/bobster.cgi?function=scenario-results-histogram&scenario=Carbide%20Carbide

and say "gee, that scenario looks imbalanced" ... after only 5 games.

80 games is significant enough to be interesting.

GaJ

Another random interesting graph apropos the topic of this thread:

Would be interesting to tell us what are the points available in this scenario.

We may find that the points have preferential distributions.....

[Two plyer campaigns ?]

I think not in PBEM

[QB differences?]

I have reviewed the points of the QB.

There was an error in my conclusion, on ground targets.

Here's the new table:

Scontro (ME) unit pt 600 terrain pt 400

Probe unit pt 500 terrain pt 500

Attack unit pt 350 terrain pt 650

Assault unit pt 250 terrain pt 750

As you can see the total is still 1000.

Points of terreain are recalculated in proportion to those indicated on the map to give the desired value.

Example map ME with two obj 10pt and 30 pt, points will be counted 100 and 300.

[QB add advanced options]

ok it's just, in QB, to maintain a certain standard settings to not confuse the players.

But it would also be interesting to have some additional options.

I am referring to the scores, and the relationship between objective of unity and terrain.

So why not add (only for to those interested) the ability to manually change the scores.

example (this is the standard setting for ME):

Unit obj -> 600 pt Terrain obj -> 400 pt

or the ratio between the two Unit obj /Terrain obj -> 3/2

Another possibility would be to take the points as set in the QB map.

Infinite for the length of battle please add also the options 35, 40, 50 and 55 minutes.

[QB differences?]

This is the table for points budget:

Battle -> tiny / samll/ medium / large / huge

Scontro (ME) 951;951/1547;1547/2560;2560/4282;4282/7209;7209

Probe 1121;780 /1836;1257/3052;2068 /5118;3445 /8631;5787

Attack 1164;738/ 1908;1185 /3175;1945 /5327;3236/8986;5432

Assault 1206;695/1981;1112/ 3298;1822/5536;3027/9342;5076

And yes " in an Assault QB, the attacker also receives some pre-battle intel ( "?" markers where some of the defenders are known/suspected to be) in the setup phase.

This is the table of QB points for unit obj. : (Manual: "number of points are rewarded for causing enemy unit casualties. The more casualties caused, the more points are awarded)

Scontro (ME) punti 600

Probe pt 500

Attack pt 350

Assault pt 250

To finish the setup area, the terreain objective zones and also the points for terreain objective zones are preset on the QB map.

Is important to remember from the manual: "Meeting Engagement, Probe, Attack, Assault, or Random. This setting has an impact of what type of Quick Battle Map will be loaded: if you select Meeting Engagement, only maps defined as Meeting Engagement will be considered for loading. If you choose any of the other Battle Types, then only maps which are NOT a Meeting Engagement are considered."

So we should already be the difference between attack, assault or probe on the map.

[QB differences?]

ok points for buy forces:

Battle -> tiny / samll/ medium / large / huge

Scontro (ME) 951;951/1547;1547/2560;2560/4282;4282/7209;7209

Probe 1121;780 /1836;1257/3052;2068 /5118;3445 /8631;5787

Atack 1164;738/ 1908;1185 /3175;1945 /5327;3236/8986;5432

Assault 1206;695/1981;1112/ 3298;1822/5536;3027/9342;5076

[QB differences?]

What are exactly the differences between Probe, Atack, Assault?

The points.

At this link also has a exact table:

http://combatmission.altervista.org/CM/Blog/Voci/2011/5/26_Guida_alle_Quick_Battle.html

Of course my blog is in italian but I think it's understandable, you can use a web translator.

[Resync of PBEM games]

I, too, are interesting to play PBEM, but there aren't players and the games do not end

[Game ManuaL (PDF) for DL]

If you buy the game, there is also the manual in PDF, even print friendly.

[Montebourg Quick battle maps]

Thanks Paper Tiger.

[Install mods in the MAC OS X version]

Installing mods seems very easy, but I can't find the "BF data folder" anywhere. I looked in the C drive....program files, CB:BN package? Do I just creat a 'Z' folder right on the desktop?

Man, do I feel stupid.........

You have the icon with double click start CMBN. Ok now not use double click, but Right click on CMBN icon (executable) -> Show package contents and open the folder ->Contents -> Resources -> tattaaaaaa DATA.

[Random map Multiplayer Tournament]

Players

1. Deadmeat

2. Berto

3. Boris Balaban

Up.

We go in three!

[Will the Rumblings of War tournament (Row) be Returning]

I'm a veteran of CM, old and new

I would like to participate

thanks

[playing this module]

I like it too. Love the feel and atmosphere of it. It's definitely not CMSF. I really enjoy playing with and learning the Soviet era equipment and organizations. Very different from what we are used to.

I just wish more people were playing it and that we start to see more diverse and varied scenarios. I think the potential is huge.

I totally agree.