76mm

Have your people talk to my people, we'll do lunch...

Yeah, of course, best to  not allow players to touch or modify games in any way, why give them what they want?  Personally, variety of maps is of critical importance to me, and the inability to use maps from the various games together is very frustrating.   OK, your turn--why is it harmful for BFC to allow players to increase the number of maps usable with each title?    
Huh?  So I shouldn't take one of your maps and make a new scenario with it?  Or I shouldn't change any units on it, or what?  Or would you prefer if I just 't use any of  your scenarios?  I can appreciate pride of authorship, but don't understand what you're getting at?

Well, if you're going to give someone (who was trying to be helpful) a hard time, best not to rely on Google translate... Actually the meaning is completely different from your "translation":
 
"За это время в общей сложности было обучено 428335 отличных снайперов, которые существенно усилили боевые порядки пехотных частей."
 
"During this time, all in all 428,335 excellent snipers were trained, which significantly strengthened the combat formations of infantry units."

According to Frank Ellis' book The Stalingrad Cauldron (p 268), the Soviets trained and deployed 428,335 snipers between 1941 and 1944 (including 1,885 women).

They've stated repeatedly that each east front game (with its modules) will cover one year.

I never played Tobruk and am sure that it is a fine game and all, but I always find it strange when people base criticisms of how "realistic" CMRT is based on some other game's rules rather than real-life data. I am sure that tobruk's rules feature more abstractions than CMRT and suspect that you are (not necessarily correctly) equating to ruk's rule so with reality.

I never played Tobruk and am sure that it is a fine game and all, but I always find it strange when people base criticisms of how "realistic" CMRT is based on some other game's rules rather than real-life data. I am sure that tobruk's rules feature more abstractions than CMRT and suspect that you are (not necessarily correctly) equating to ruk's rule so with reality.